|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2004-03-15 11:28:45
|
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 11:21, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Hi all and Szaka in particular, > > I have changed MFT_RECORD to include the NTFS 3.x specific fields. I am > providing a copy of the old MFT_RECORD as MFT_RECORD_1x, primarily > because mkntfs needs it at the moment. Err, I meant 3.1+ specific fields and have hence renamed MFT_RECORD_1x to MFT_RECORD_OLD. > Can everyone please check their utilities for breakage due to this and > fix them? I looked and fixed the library as well as mkntfs and > ntfsclone (I think). I didn't notice any other utilities being > affected... > > Szaka, could you check ntfsclone for me? Is my change (see below) > correct and sufficient? > > I changed wipe_unused_mft() like this: > > - /* MFT_RECORD doesn't have the XP specific 6 bytes, so add it */ > - unused = m->bytes_in_use - (sizeof(MFT_RECORD) + 6); > + unused = m->bytes_in_use - sizeof(MFT_RECORD); > wiped_unused_mft += wipe_data((char *)m, sizeof(MFT_RECORD), unused); > > Best regards, > > Anton Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
