|
From: Szakacsits S. <sz...@si...> - 2004-03-12 17:36:37
|
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>
> last_mft_rec = volume->nr_mft_records - 1;
> for (; inode <= last_mft_rec; inode++) {
> blah...
> err = ntfs_file_record_read(volume, mref, &ni->mrec, NULL);
> if (err == -1) {
> free(ni);
> continue;
> }
> blah...
> }
>
> The above continue would always trigger for all mft records beyond
> initialized ones so the new nr_mft_records actually saves you from
> having to go through them!
[ ... ]
> Convinced?
Yes. If you meant the change this way (I didn't check it out yet) then
that's ok and indeed can save some time.
Szaka
|
