Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] volume->nr_mft_records meaning modified!

[Szakacsits S. <sz...@si...>]

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> 
> > "Modify meaning of ntfs_volume->nr_mft_records to be the number of
> > initialized mft records, not total mft records.  This makes far more
> > sense and in fact reflects how nr_mft_records is being used in both
> > libntfs and the utilities."
> [...] 
> > Could people using nr_mft_records in their applications double check for
> > me and tell me if this is a problem for them?
> 
> This totally and fatally breaks ntfsresize and ntfsclone.

Well, maybe not. It depends what you mean under "initialized mft records".
I've seen many uninitialized mft records records in between initialized
mft records. However if you mean the uninitialized mft records at the end
then it shouldn't be a problem.

	Szaka