|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2004-03-11 09:57:40
|
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 09:27, Pawel Kot wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Philipp Thomas wrote: > > * Anton Altaparmakov (ai...@ca...) [20040309 23:45]: > > > > > Oh, I also changed an option: From now on all posts going through the > > > list will get an explicit Reply-To: header with the list address in it. > > > > Sorry, but IMO that is a grave mistake. For the gory details, see > > > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > I think there are as many people that agree with this argumentation as > that don't agree. Personally I think they are void and prefer setting > Reply-To with the list address. > > Anyway, the setting does not work. You are right it doesn't. I have now switched it off, just in case it was doing something else... Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
