|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2004-03-03 15:09:11
|
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 13:26, Philipp Thomas wrote: > * Anton Altaparmakov (ai...@ca...) [20040303 14:00]: > Why would they be binary incompatible? The result of using 'struct foo;' > without -fms-extensions and 'foo;' with -fms-extensions should be identical, > so this change shouldn't affect the ABI. Good point. > I understand, but you're barking up the wrong tree :) Blame MS, not the GCC > folks. Hehe. The problem is MS is not very talkative / responsive and something we don't have any control / influence over. GCC folks are people one can talk to. (-: Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
