|
From: Pawel K. <pk...@be...> - 2004-02-26 13:43:17
|
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:21, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > > > Adding NTFS 3.1 support would be also wonderful. There aren't many changes > > > compared to NTFS 1.2 and this could help _a lot_ to make (automatic) > > > testing and development easier. There wouldn't be need to get XP images, > > > we could create whenever we need. > > > > Huh? I never added NTFS 3.x support because any form of Windows 2k or > > later will just upgrade the volume on mount so it seems silly to have > > mkntfs more complicated. > > It's not silly. First of all I can not confirm you're right that all Win > versions, in all cases will upgrade from 1.2 to 3.x. Maybe you only tried > an NT4 -> W2K upgrade and in that case it make sense to upgrade NTFS but > not otherwise, as I've seen several times. > > Secondly and most importantly, you _need_ Windows to do this. And that's > silly :-) Why would you need NTFS without Windows anyway ;-) I really think it is not the problem if Anton is right in regard that Windows will convert on mount. pkot -- mailto:pk...@be... http://www.gnokii.org/ |
