|
From: Szakacsits S. <sz...@si...> - 2004-02-25 20:18:41
|
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Per Olofsson wrote: > I see. The reason I never sent anything to you is that my utilities > are just a hack That's ok :) > and don't really work as they are now. That's not so ok :) > Are ntfsimage and restoreimage available somewhere? No, AFAIK. The only ntfsimage reference google finds is here: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/c/chiark-utils/chiark-utils_4.0.0/changelog > ntfsclone and ntfsimage do essentially the same thing, they skip over > unused blocks. The output format is merely a detail and could be > chosen with a command-line option. I think it would be better if they > were one utility, in order to reduce duplicated efforts. I think that was also what I suggested. ntfsimage and ntfsrestore? Or just ntfsimage? I'm also quite sure when we would be ready Ian will also arrive saying "here is my ntfsimage I promised a year ago!" :) Merging the two using the name ntfsimage would solve my "ntfsclone syntax problem" also :) Szaka |
