|
From: Szakacsits S. <sz...@si...> - 2005-08-01 21:08:49
|
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 00:02 +0300, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: >>> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 22:37 +0200, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: >>>> >>>> Please also note that EOPNOTSUPP == ENOTSUP, which is used in quite many >>>> places in libntfs already. >>> >>> Yes, I know, but prefer it because of portability, kernel doesn't have >>> ENOTSUP, only EOPNOTSUPP. >> >> How about replacing all ENOTSUP to EOPNOTSUPP? > > I think it's good idea. I use EOPNOTSUPP in all my new code, but never > had time for mass-replace in the library. I can do it in about 10 seconds, if it's also OK for Anton. Szaka |
