|
From: Richard R. <nt...@fl...> - 2003-11-15 11:01:57
|
Hi Anton, > > > an embarrassing mess. > Isn't almost all software? ... a lot of commercial software > ... why they don't show anyone their sourcecode hehe, very very likely :-) > > However I think ntfsapps.so > I am not sure whether we should just have one libntfs > which does both lower and higher level functions or two (or more) Hmm, tricky. The higher-level ones will always rely on the lower, so it's a question of whether anyone, outside our group, will ever need the low level routines. > My personal focus is only on low level stuff as I am interested in > getting the kernel driver finished and libntfs and ntfsprogs is nothing > more than a useful testbed/development environment for me. For the moment, my focus is the utils. Driver write support is definitely the most requested feature to add, but it will take a long time. However, having a working resize and defrag, allows new people to start using Linux. The two things benefit different groups. > I hope that everyone else will keep doing whatever it is they would like to see > done. (-: Great :-) Cheers, Rich |
