|
From: Szakacsits S. <sz...@si...> - 2003-11-06 16:03:13
|
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > I woulde be interested in comments whether to place libntfs-gnome-vfs (the > newly merged libntfs module for GNOME VFS) in a separate rpm or to keep it > in the normal ntfsprogs rpm. At present both are in the same rpm. > > I am tempted to leave them in one rpm but it does have the drawback that > the ntfsprogs rpm now has more dependencies in that it requires glib and a > whole lot of other stuff (here is a full list of the added requirements: > /bin/sh libbonobo-activation.so.4 libcom_err.so.3 libcrypto.so.4 > libdl.so.2 libgconf-2.so.4 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 > libgnomevfs-2.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgssapi_krb5.so.2 > libgthread-2.0.so.0 libk5crypto.so.3 libkrb5.so.3 liblinc.so.1 libm.so.6 > libORBit-2.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) > libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2) libresolv.so.2 librt.so.1 libssl.so.4 > libxml2.so.2 libz.so.1). > > Do people think this is ok or do we need two rpms one without dependencies > on gnome and one with? I think it's a very bad idea to bring into play all these dependencies. There are a LOT OF rescue, recovery, backup, etc, etc distro, CD's etc and about over 99% don't need these. > Also do we want to modify the build process so that if gnome is not > installed or if gnome is disabled using a (to be implemented) option to Definitely. IMHO in the most typical cases, gnome isn't installed at all. Szaka |
