|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2003-11-06 14:56:32
|
Hi all, I woulde be interested in comments whether to place libntfs-gnome-vfs (the newly merged libntfs module for GNOME VFS) in a separate rpm or to keep it in the normal ntfsprogs rpm. At present both are in the same rpm. I am tempted to leave them in one rpm but it does have the drawback that the ntfsprogs rpm now has more dependencies in that it requires glib and a whole lot of other stuff (here is a full list of the added requirements: /bin/sh libbonobo-activation.so.4 libcom_err.so.3 libcrypto.so.4 libdl.so.2 libgconf-2.so.4 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgnomevfs-2.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgssapi_krb5.so.2 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libk5crypto.so.3 libkrb5.so.3 liblinc.so.1 libm.so.6 libORBit-2.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2) libresolv.so.2 librt.so.1 libssl.so.4 libxml2.so.2 libz.so.1). Do people think this is ok or do we need two rpms one without dependencies on gnome and one with? Also do we want to modify the build process so that if gnome is not installed or if gnome is disabled using a (to be implemented) option to ./configure we can still build libntfs and the utilities? If we wanted to do this I think we would definitely need to make two different rpms, one without libntfs-gnomevfs and one with just libntfs-gnomevfs. Comments? Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
