> I'd also like but I'm afraid we must distinguish them. I renamed my
> ntfsimage to ntfsdump, so it will be easier to refer to them. At least
> temporarily and we can see later on if merge make sense or not.
I think I've found the right name [first time in my life?]. ntfsclone.
Because actually that's what my tool does, clones. And hopefully this will
be also scray, unusual enough for people with real imaging need, not to
bother [mis]using it. The only problem, the metadata-only dumps fits the
name ntfsdump better ... Opinions? The name is the only showstopper to send
it for playing.
Szaka
|