|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2003-03-28 10:47:26
|
Hi, On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Philipp Thomas wrote: > * Anton Altaparmakov (ai...@ca...) [20030327 17:20]: > > I disagree that it is gross. Microsoft compilers work with it just fine. > We don't disagree that much :) I agree that anonymous structs and unions are > indeed a usefull abstraction. It's the use of anonymous typedef'd > structs/unions I find gross. Ah, ok. I just do typedefs because I am lazy. (-; I know Linus doesn't like typedefs much either so if you wanted to submit a patch killing the typedefs and using "struct MFT_RECORD" instead of just "MFT_RECORD" then I would accept that. But I doubt this would solve the gcc problem. We would still need the -fms-extensions, wouldn't we? > 2003-27.03.2003 Philipp Thomas <pt...@su...> > * Makefile: Use -fms-extensions if gcc groks it. I will hold on for your reply to above question and apply if still necessary. > * super.c(parse_ntfs_boot_sector): Correct the check for 64-bit > clusters. Applied. Thanks for your work! Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
