|
From: Szakacsits S. <sz...@si...> - 2003-02-19 12:02:57
|
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > > How the new development tree should be "numbered"? The kernel style > > odd/even minor version won't work (the release is 1.7.x). The x.y.99 > > is not talkative and more importantly not scary (more write to NTFS is > > coming). An also widely used versioning is marking the development > > branch as -dev or -devel, so e.g. 1.8-devel could be used and the next > > release would be 1.8.0 or 1.9.0, etc. > > I don't think we need a development branch. The snapshots should be just Ok, bad wording. We need a new product *version*. So just changing 1.7.1 in the top configure.in. The current development 1.7.1-200302191139 tar.bz snaposhots or 1.7.1 development BK pulls are 1) confusing 2) ends up reporting issues in stable version 1.7.1 however that's not the case due to lack of proper versioning. Szaka |
