|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2003-02-19 11:32:14
|
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > How the new development tree should be "numbered"? The kernel style > odd/even minor version won't work (the release is 1.7.x). The x.y.99 > is not talkative and more importantly not scary (more write to NTFS is > coming). An also widely used versioning is marking the development > branch as -dev or -devel, so e.g. 1.8-devel could be used and the next > release would be 1.8.0 or 1.9.0, etc. I don't think we need a development branch. The snapshots should be just fine as far as developmental releases go and as far as BK is concerned people interested in the stable releases can download the correct TAGged version while people wanting the latest and greatest just download the current version. If you have any reasons for wanting two separate branches then please let me know what they are... > I have resize and imaging things to submit. Just submit them! Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
