|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2002-07-11 16:27:18
|
At 16:18 11/07/02, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: >On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > > BOOL ntfs_is_version_supported(ntfs_volume *vol) > > > > > >Name is ok (first I thought the same) but please no BOOL. It just > > >conflicts with everybody's own BOOL definition, int is better. > > > > We already have BOOL defined so as soon as you include an ntfs header you > > would have the conflict. > >Yes but it will be easier to clean up later ;) Anyway vol must be >checked for NULL so BOOL isn't enough anymore. Yes you are of course perfectly right. Silly me. -1 + errno is required after all. Anton -- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
