|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2002-04-04 13:37:06
|
At 16:20 01/04/02, Padraig Brady wrote:
>Joachim Breuer wrote:
>>Nerijus Baliunas <ne...@us...> writes:
>>
>>>On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:57:07 +0000 (GMT) Anton Altaparmakov
>>><ai...@cu...> wrote:
>>>
>>>[...] Discussion about default fmask, mc, being able to run in place
>>> snipped
>>>
>>>People using Linux usually keep data files on fat and ntfs permissions, not
>>>executables (IMHO).
>>
>>For the sake of another vote: Yes, I do use NTFS primarily for data
>>storage, and No, I don't like gratuitous x-bits. Not *at all*.
>
>Anton, there have been no votes the other way. What do you think now?
I am tending towards a default fmask of 0177 now. I will change it for the
next release.
Happy? (-;
Cheers,
Anton
--
"I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/
ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
|
