|
From: Richard R. <web...@fl...> - 2001-03-26 15:54:53
|
On 26 Mar 2001 11:35:47 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Great job! A lot more readable, indeed. The hovering links are a touch > confusing but probably better than having almost every word underlined, > disturbing the reading flow. Thanks. If I'm going to be looking at these documents a lot, I don't want every other word to be blue and underlined. When ALL the links are in place, you should be able to click on almost anything. > > There's still quite a lot of work to do on the docs. > > There's still a lot we don't understand about NTFS. > But we understand a lot more compared to before! Absolutely. But most of the information was in people's heads or buried in source code. > I think if we manage to transfer all the info from > linux-ntfs/include/attrib.h on Sourceforge into your new docs [Note: Anton has taken every SDK, API in existance and distilled them into attrib.h, well worth a read] Yes. I've got to to go through attrib.h very carefully. That will take quite a while. I've also got to re-read my 'decode' files. Hundreds of Kb of annotated hex dumps (dating back to mid '96). > we would have an _almost_ complete set of NTFS specifications. > I would imagine the most complete set in existence. o-: Shh... Don't tell anyone. > > * Suggestions > Here is one: How about moving the docs onto Sourceforge? > We can place them under CVS control for easy development and > put them up, say in http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/ntfs/ I had a trial play on SourceForge. The documentation system doesn't seem to allow sub-directories. Furthermore it eats any colour scheme you have. I'll put them under CVS control when I've finished attrib.h Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) nt...@fl... |
