Hi Tom,
>
> On 4/9/22 3:19 AM, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> Get rid of redundant assignments which end up in values not being
>> read either because they are overwritten or the function ends.
>
> This log is the same as your last patch.
>
> Instead of a general statement on deadstores, a more specific
>
> analysis of the setting being removed would be helpful.
>
> This will mean splitting the patch to match the analysis.
>
> Tom
>
I think that this explanation in a commit is enough for such a trivial patch.
It informs that we are fixing clang-tidy findings related to deadstores
in a block subsystem. What analysis would you want to see?
Something like "Remove deadstore assignment ret = -EINVAL in a function bio_map_user_iov" ?
I think that it will create too much of not needed overhead.
Cheers,
Michal
|