|
From: Christoph H. <hc...@in...> - 2009-05-20 12:38:49
|
Can you run the hunk below past Anton and get it upstream separately?
The code does indeed looks extremly fishy, but I'd rather not see it
go in a large unrelated patch..
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 02:19:43PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs/super.c b/fs/ntfs/super.c
> index f76951d..c4cb157 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs/super.c
> @@ -2373,39 +2373,13 @@ static void ntfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> vol->mftmirr_ino = NULL;
> }
> /*
> - * If any dirty inodes are left, throw away all mft data page cache
> - * pages to allow a clean umount. This should never happen any more
> - * due to mft.c::ntfs_mft_writepage() cleaning all the dirty pages as
> - * the underlying mft records are written out and cleaned. If it does,
> + * We should have no dirty inodes left, due to
> + * mft.c::ntfs_mft_writepage() cleaning all the dirty pages as
> + * the underlying mft records are written out and cleaned.
> * happen anyway, we want to know...
> */
> ntfs_commit_inode(vol->mft_ino);
> write_inode_now(vol->mft_ino, 1);
> - if (sb_has_dirty_inodes(sb)) {
> - const char *s1, *s2;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&vol->mft_ino->i_mutex);
> - truncate_inode_pages(vol->mft_ino->i_mapping, 0);
> - mutex_unlock(&vol->mft_ino->i_mutex);
> - write_inode_now(vol->mft_ino, 1);
> - if (sb_has_dirty_inodes(sb)) {
> - static const char *_s1 = "inodes";
> - static const char *_s2 = "";
> - s1 = _s1;
> - s2 = _s2;
> - } else {
> - static const char *_s1 = "mft pages";
> - static const char *_s2 = "They have been thrown "
> - "away. ";
> - s1 = _s1;
> - s2 = _s2;
> - }
> - ntfs_error(sb, "Dirty %s found at umount time. %sYou should "
> - "run chkdsk. Please email "
> - "lin...@li... and say "
> - "that you saw this message. Thank you.", s1,
> - s2);
> - }
> #endif /* NTFS_RW */
>
> iput(vol->mft_ino);
|
