You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: GONZALEZ J. (M. SICCRF) <joa...@dg...> - 2006-05-19 15:06:43
|
Hello, When I probe to clone a NTFS partition in a fat32 partition (exemple : ntfsclone --save-image -o /dev/sda5/windows.img /dev/sda1) I = have this message : File size limit exceeded and it stop ! My partition sda1 is NTFS of courses (windows XP) and the partition sda5 = is fat32 and its size is 35000 MB The disk is : ATA Maxtor 6L160M0, with 160 Gigas bytes) With a ext2 partition, it's work well, and the size of my NTFS image is = 8000 MB Jo |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-04-07 10:12:42
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3674435 By: szaka ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-04-07 10:02:30
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3674421 By: kasperberg Hi, Did you see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MountingWindowsPartitions about reading ntfs-partitions? When you remove the "umask=0222" option or replace it with "umask=000" you might be able to have write support but with some restrictions (see the link to the FAQ below). Did you see http://wiki.linux-ntfs.org/doku.php?id=ntfs-en#can_the_driver_write_ to_an_ntfs_volume_too about writing ntfs-partions? Instead of using a windows ext2 driver you can do the following to share documents between you ubuntu and windows installations is to: - create a FAT32 partition - use this partition for sharing (Maybe you can add this to the wiki.) I hope this helps you. If you have more questions just let me know. With kind regards, Kasper van den Berg PS. I'm not sure if the linux-ntfs project still uses the sourceforge-forums. Maybe the forums on http://wiki.linux-ntfs.org/ are a better place. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-04-06 18:16:27
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3673354 By: nobody hi, i'm a noob; how ca i install it in ubuntu breezy, and ho w to write this ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-02-16 14:03:28
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3579682 By: nobody Sure, look at the link on the title, or try the linux-ntfs-dev mailing list. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-02-16 13:45:22
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3579655 By: nobody Please tell us if it still exists any related discussion list / forum for the NTFS tech questions. Thank you ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-02-12 12:39:26
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3571767 By: szaka Please don't post here, the Linux-NTFS project forums moved to http://forum.linux-ntfs.org/. See you there! The Linux-NTFS project team ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-02-12 12:38:06
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3571765 By: szaka Please don't post here, the Linux-NTFS project forums have moved to http://forum.linux-ntfs.org/ See you there! The Linux-NTFS project team ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-02-12 12:18:13
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3571756 By: szaka These are the project download pages, not what you sent (home page => download): http://www.linux-ntfs.org/content/view/19/37/ https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13956 How did you find that "hidden" repository? Thanks. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-02-12 10:00:42
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3571671 By: nobody Yes, the web site is indeed FUBAR. I found lots of RPMs here: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/linux-ntfs/ ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-02-09 15:27:25
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3567475 By: nobody How are the bits grouped in the $Bitmap MFT file BYTE by BYTE? The 0 indexed LCN mapped in $Bitmap is the first cluster of ntfs volume (the first cluster of the $Mft file?) i.e Let's take n $Bitmap content something like 0101 1101 1010 1111 0101 1010 1111 0101..... Are they grouped like? BYTE by BYTE ? 0101 1101 1010 1111 0101 1010 1111 0101 LCN 0123 4567 89 ..... Please give as much details as possible for example if they are stored on > 8 bytes if they are grouped in little endian form etc Thank you in advance ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2006-02-01 20:57:43
|
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, ^MusT@QeeM^ * wrote: > Whats the difference between i586 and i686 kernel architecture? > How do I know which one is suitable for me? i586 = optimized for Pentium CPU i686 = Optimized for Pentium 2 and later CPU. Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
|
From: ^<Mu...@Qe...> - 2006-01-30 13:56:35
|
Whats the difference between i586 and i686 kernel architecture? How do I know which one is suitable for me? -- To add me as your Friendster, just copy and paste URL below: http://www.friendster.com/login.php?aff_id=3D4832710&link_id=3D1&count=3Dcl= ick |
|
From: Michael D. <mi...@do...> - 2006-01-25 11:36:29
|
Hi List, i put together a mini-howto on cloning a XP-installation and making the clones multibootable. The idea is to copy (using ntfsclone) a fresh/clean XP-installation to two additional partitions on the same HD. The new ones should then get customised for special purposes like gaming or testing stuff. Then i'd like to create some images of these XP-clones so that i can easily reset them if^Wwhen they get messed up. I got stuck two times trying to achieve this. The first time Anton Altaparmakov - i gues he's well known around here 8-) - gave me some good advice in the linux-ntfs.org-forum.[1] And after being on the wrong track several times for several weeks i found some very useful Information on Dan Goodells website[2]. In his excellent text: Understanding Multibooting[3] Since i had some difficulties finding the info and my setup doesn't seem _that_ exotic to me i thought that it would be worth the effort to write a mini-howto about the whole procedure. I put it up at [4] Comments welcome. Please CC me since i'm not on the list. Cheers Michael [1] http://forum.linux-ntfs.org/viewtopic.php?t=76 [2] http://www.goodells.net/dan/index.htm [3] http://www.goodells.net/multiboot/index.htm [4] http://www.dominok.net/en/it/en.it.clonexp.html |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-24 12:21:08
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3538166 By: nobody This is solved. The recovery console fixboot command apperently resores the boot-secotor from the copy contained in the end of the partition. I still can't boot the disk unfortunately. Olof ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-23 12:59:37
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3536387 By: nobody Hi there. I had a NTFS-disk that ceased to boot but could be mounted as RO in Fedora core 3. Then I used the (XP) recovery console and tried to repair MBR and the boot sector but it failed. Finaly I did something like fixmbr /Device/Harddrive1/Partition1 After this the superblock is damaged according to the linux kernel module and the the disk can no loger be mounted. Can I fix this? How? Thanks in advance. Olof ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-18 06:16:07
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3528256 By: szaka The I/O error indicates you have bad sectors. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-17 21:29:47
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3527687 By: tukozaki Sorry I looked for a way to solve my prob. by my own. If i'd new you'd answer so fast, I'd wait a bit more... Now you see I made a backup image of the un-defraged (with Pd) with ntfsclone --save-image -o - /dev/hda1 | gzip -c... So I'd be happy to put it back and launch what I can to contribute to the project. BUT when I tried to move the 1.2GB hda1_img.gz on another drive, I got an I/O error (twice). Dunno if that will be usable at all :( All I know is that I'll try before I use the space made available with Pd7 + ntfsresize. Note that I did an e2fsck -c the day before on the partition where i saved the image.gz and it was clean. See, the matter is that you've got your priority and I have mine. But I thereby promise you that I'll try those commands if I can put back the image made with ntfsclne, as well than I'll wait for your input next time I encounter an issue while using on of your progs (I've got a small business and may use use it sooner or later). I also plan to www-publish in French what is achievable with some of ntfs-progs utilities at the right place (my website with 500 visites/day then fr.wikipedia.org where it isn't yet covered). Now you're right, maybe next time :-) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-17 15:56:47
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3526838 By: szaka > I'll show the output of ntfsresize after boot-time defrag (with Pd7) > rather than what you requested me to do. Sorry about that. It's indeed pity. You had the chance to contribute to the project but you missed it. The info you sent is completely irrelevant and uninteresting for us (unreliable, incomplete, not low level enough, etc). > I'll print here whatever output you might want to look further. Please just > ask :) You already "destroyed" your unique layout. Maybe next time :-) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-17 14:45:23
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3526712 By: tukozaki Thank you for your quick reply. Thins improved very much after boot time defrag with trial PerfectDisk Roxo software. So I googled last night, looking for a defragger/tweak that would fully defrag all the NTFS, MFT included... I finally found that perfectDisk would do it (1). Actually, it did it, in a fast & apparently effective way, therewhile I'll show the output of ntfsresize after boot-time defrag (with Pd7) rather than what you requested me to do. Sorry about that. # ntfsresize -n -s 5G /dev/hda1 ----------------------------- ntfsresize v1.12.1 (libntfs 8:1:0) Device name : /dev/hda1 NTFS volume version: 3.1 Cluster size : 4096 bytes Current volume size: 10635248128 bytes (10636 MB) Current device size: 10635254784 bytes (10636 MB) New volume size : 4999995904 bytes (5000 MB) Checking filesystem consistency ... ... ... completed Accounting clusters ... Space in use : 1790 MB (16.8%) Collecting resizing constraints ... Needed relocations : 154739 (634 MB) Schedule chkdsk for NTFS consistency check at Windows boot time ... Resetting $LogFile ... (this might take a while) Relocating needed data ... ... ... Updating $BadClust file ... Updating $Bitmap file ... Updating Boot record ... The read-only test run ended successfully. ----------------------------- It runs way better than before boot-time defrag : ! I'll print here whatever output you might want to look further. Please just ask :) You might want to see the screenshots I made before/after defraging from within winXP, as they could give you part of the info you requested (2) ----- (1) http://www.mindprod.com/jgloss/defragger.html (2) Screenshots : - unmovable parts & MFT info : http://c.laloy.free.fr/howtos/images/windows/Dell400L_hda1-MFT-un-movable.png - C:\> dir /a $mft C: : http://c.laloy.free.fr/howtos/images/windows/Dell400L_hda1_dir-a--$mft-c.png - MFT Zone & stuff at the end of the partition before perfectdisk7 boot-defrag (all that MFT stuff was created on the very same day, a few months before I bought the laptop) : http://c.laloy.free.fr/howtos/images/windows/Dell400L_perfectdisk7_graph.png - MFT Zone & stuff moved at the ~middle of the partition after PD7 boot-defrag : http://c.laloy.free.fr/howtos/images/windows/Dell400L_perfectdisk7_graph_after -boot-defrag.png ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-17 05:58:30
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3526106 By: szaka Please send the full outputs of ntfsresize --verbose --info /dev/hda1 and ntfsinfo -v -d /dev/hda1 -i 0 Your scenario is possible if something relocated the full $MFT into an absolutely contiguous file to the end of your partition. If this is the case then we should add support for this scenario asap because many people are in the false belief that defrag is needed before resizing so they may spoil what actually would just work (so far there wasn't any such report as yours). ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-17 00:51:41
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3525915 By: nobody # ntfsinfo -v -d /dev/hda1 -i 0 | grep reference ------------------------------------------------- give null ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-17 00:45:05
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3525912 By: nobody After having used ntfsclone on a SATA HDD & writen a presentation in French on ntfsprogs, I tried to use ntfsresize on my Dell Latittude L400 laptop, but it says it can't. # ntfsresize -n -i /dev/hda1 ---------------------------- ntfsresize v1.12.1 (libntfs 8:1:0) Device name : /dev/hda1 NTFS volume version: 3.1 Cluster size : 4096 bytes Current volume size: 10635248128 bytes (10636 MB) Current device size: 10635254784 bytes (10636 MB) Checking filesystem consistency ... Accounting clusters ... ... Space in use : 3039 MB (28.6%) Collecting resizing constraints ... You might resize at 10632957952 bytes or 10633 MB (freeing 3 MB). Please make a test run using both the -n and -s options before real resizing I now there's some MFT stuff well after what is actually used on that NTFS partition : I've tried O&ODefrag Pro to see if it can do something, but it didn't. ntfscluster -c [some range between 10000000 & the end at ~20772030) /dev/hda1 ---------------------------- says something like : ... ^[[0m^[[31mInode: 13140 ... with a few errors (~3 for each 500000 clusters tested) Please, does somebody knows if there anything I can do to resize this f***ing windowz partition that takes 50% of the HDD ? ps forgot my sourceforge passwd again :( ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-09 14:04:47
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3512649 By: nobody I have used Partition Manager 2005 with success while trying to resize existing partitions with data... ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-01-09 13:33:09
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3512592 By: nobody I've got Win XP installed on a 250 Meg HD. When I created the intstalltion, I allocated 20 Gig for the main partition, and left the rest for data. I soon realised that the 20 Gig wasn't enough for my needs, so I started compressing the files to save space. I've now reached the situation where I've basically run out of space on my main XP partition. I've tried using ntfsresize (via QParted) to manipulate my partitions, but find that whilst I can release the unused space from my data partition, I can't utilise the released space for my 20 Gig partition. Can anyone suggest a strategy I may use to solve my problem, please? Jim Ford ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
