You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Alexander K. <ale...@ya...> - 2017-02-04 18:10:54
|
Hi, I`m new to the subject, but it seems to me the only point to get solution to my problem.. I have a 160gb 2,5 hdd with 2-3 surface scratches in the middle of avaliable space, single NTFS partition. Due to this scratches , factory relocation map is full. chkdsk report that drive has ~14MB Bad, other 149GB are "OK". But in badblocks neighbour aerias read-write operations are instable and really slow. if it is possible to add SOMEHOW all this neighbour sectors (that have access time above say, 50 ms) to ntfs stream $BadClus:$Bad ? Thanks in advance for the ideas, Alex -- З павагай, | Mit Freundlichen Grüßen, | Kind Regards, Alexander Kuzmenkov |
|
From: Alexander K. <ale...@ya...> - 2017-02-04 17:57:41
|
Hi, I`m new to the subject, but it seems to me the only point to get solution to my problem.. I have a 160gb 2,5 hdd with 2-3 surface scratches in the middle of avaliable space, single NTFS partition. Due to this scratches , factory relocation map is full. chkdsk report that drive has ~14MB Bad, other 149GB are "OK". But in badblocks neighbour aerias read-write operations are instable and really slow. if it is possible to add SOMEHOW all this neighbour sectors (that have access time above say, 50 ms) to ntfs stream $BadClus:$Bad ? Thanks in advance for the ideas, Alex -- З павагай, | Mit Freundlichen Grüßen, | Kind Regards, Alexander Kuzmenkov |
|
From: Gustavo G. <gu...@co...> - 2015-09-14 17:37:11
|
Recuva, perhaps. :-) El 14 de septiembre de 2015 07:08:41 CDT, Vyacheslav Gonakhchyan <yt...@gm...> escribió: >Hi, everyone! >Hope that someone will read this and tell me if there is something I >can do >to recover Not Formatted NTFS partition. > >I have a lot of partitions on /dev/sda > >NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT >sda 8:0 0 465.8G 0 disk >├─sda1 8:1 0 100M 0 part >├─sda2 8:2 0 1.9G 0 part >├─sda3 8:3 0 20G 0 part >├─sda4 8:4 0 52.6G 0 part >├─sda5 8:5 0 125.4G 0 part >├─sda6 8:6 0 265.3G 0 part >└─sda7 8:7 0 520M 0 part > >After trying to resize sda6 to give more space to sda4 something went >wrong >in Acronis Disk Director 12. I ended up with Not Formatted sda6. >mount.ntfs-3g could not mount sda6 with "Invalid NTFS signature" error. >ntfsfix helped to restore PBS. Then I used testdisk to copy PBS to >CPBS. >testdisk also tried to recover MFT but could not. Then mount.ntfs-3g >adviced to run chkdsk /f on it. I tried and chkdsk failed with "unable >to >determine volume version and state" error. > >I tried to use photorec to recover files. It worked but without names >and >directory structure. Is there a better free tool to do this with names? >Will it help to do quick format on sda6 to rebuild MFT? > >Thanks, >Viacheslav > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Linux-NTFS-User mailing list >Lin...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-ntfs-user -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
|
From: Vyacheslav G. <yt...@gm...> - 2015-09-14 12:08:50
|
Hi, everyone! Hope that someone will read this and tell me if there is something I can do to recover Not Formatted NTFS partition. I have a lot of partitions on /dev/sda NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 465.8G 0 disk ├─sda1 8:1 0 100M 0 part ├─sda2 8:2 0 1.9G 0 part ├─sda3 8:3 0 20G 0 part ├─sda4 8:4 0 52.6G 0 part ├─sda5 8:5 0 125.4G 0 part ├─sda6 8:6 0 265.3G 0 part └─sda7 8:7 0 520M 0 part After trying to resize sda6 to give more space to sda4 something went wrong in Acronis Disk Director 12. I ended up with Not Formatted sda6. mount.ntfs-3g could not mount sda6 with "Invalid NTFS signature" error. ntfsfix helped to restore PBS. Then I used testdisk to copy PBS to CPBS. testdisk also tried to recover MFT but could not. Then mount.ntfs-3g adviced to run chkdsk /f on it. I tried and chkdsk failed with "unable to determine volume version and state" error. I tried to use photorec to recover files. It worked but without names and directory structure. Is there a better free tool to do this with names? Will it help to do quick format on sda6 to rebuild MFT? Thanks, Viacheslav |
|
From: Michael L. <ml...@lu...> - 2010-09-27 13:07:21
|
Michael Lueck wrote: > Not until I added the wipe of the partition did the restore work properly. I restored a given image, rebooted, still the C-A-D screen. Puzzled why I could only find images taken joined to the domain, > I added an erase of the partition, and restored the same image. THEN I rebooted and got the "Welcome" screen I was expecting to see. Well I tested again making sure exactly which ntfsclone image I was restoring... placing extra meaningful names in the various snapshots taken. I can restore ntfsclone images WITHOUT wiping the partition with dd, and the easy test of restoring images not joined / joined to the Samba PDC clearly works as expected. This testing was done with Ubuntu 10.04 x32. -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ |
|
From: Michael L. <ml...@lu...> - 2010-06-29 21:05:22
|
Greetings- ** Note: Previously I sent this question to the email addy found on the ntfsclone man page that was listed to report problems to, which goes to the -dev list. Trying on -user as I have not received a response on -dev. I have been working with ntfsclone and ntfs-3g for several versions of Ubuntu now. Recently with Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic) or 10.04 (Lucid) I encountered that I needed to erase the NTFS partition in order to get a successful restore of the image. (I think the machine was still running 9.10 when I encountered the following error, though I have since upgraded the machine to 10.04) Specifically why I discovered it, I have made several snapshots of a Windows XP partition. I was trying to find the last backup BEFORE I joined our Samba PDC domain. I would restore the image, reboot into XP, and was waiting to see the "Welcome" screen rather than the C-A-D screen indicating the workstation image had been joined to the domain. Not until I added the wipe of the partition did the restore work properly. I restored a given image, rebooted, still the C-A-D screen. Puzzled why I could only find images taken joined to the domain, I added an erase of the partition, and restored the same image. THEN I rebooted and got the "Welcome" screen I was expecting to see. Below is the restore script I am talking about: #!/bin/bash echo "Erasing the Windows partition" /bin/dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda1 echo "Loading the Windows partition" /bin/gunzip -c 20100409-171431-PackingConfig.cdrive.img.gz | /usr/sbin/ntfsclone --restore-image --overwrite /dev/sda1 - The syntax looks about the same as the man page for ntfsclone indicates to use. I find no mention that the partition must be blank in order to get a good restore. Any clues why the erase would be needed? Sincerely, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ |
|
From: Peter B. <pet...@ym...> - 2010-06-10 20:43:51
|
Hi All
Can residual data be found in MFT Slack, and if so, under what general circumstances?
Thanks
Regards
Peter Bell
|
|
From: Miller, S. <Sha...@yr...> - 2010-04-26 14:05:14
|
Good day Pete, How would you feel about booting the Windows, going through any initial setup it might offer you (having just come fresh from a vendor), then resizing after a nice, clean, old-fashioned shut-down? Perhaps if you are hopeful to copy this dual-boot state to some other disks you could even look into re-sealing the Windows however the vendor did that. If so, you might then be inclined to capture an image of your disk before-hand so you can snoop around in it, looking for wherever SysPrep's current incarnation is. At least in Windows XP/2003, Windows uses HKLM\SYSTEM\MountedDevices\ in the Registry to associate C: with a particular volume under HKLM\SYSTEM\ControlSet00X\Enum\STORAGE\. Removing the association for C: causes Windows to re-scan HDDs, looking for a disk matching params that NTLDR passed on. I'm not sure if this is the same for BOOTMGR and Windows > 2003. Good luck. A backup image of the whole disk is always handy. - Shao Miller |
|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2010-04-26 09:25:10
|
Hi, On 24 Apr 2010, at 23:04, Pete McCann wrote: > I have a hard drive image file with a Windows 7 installation that I > captured prior to first boot. It looks like this: > > bigmedia:/var/extra1/images# losetup -fsr ./netbook-working-sda.img > /dev/loop0 > bigmedia:/var/extra1/images# fdisk -lu /dev/loop0 > > Disk /dev/loop0: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders, total 312581808 sectors > Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes > Disk identifier: 0xdc7a3828 > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/loop0p1 63 25173854 12586896 27 Unknown > /dev/loop0p2 * 25173855 25382699 104422+ 7 HPFS/NTFS > /dev/loop0p3 25382700 312579759 143598530 7 HPFS/NTFS > bigmedia:/var/extra1/images# > > > I want to shrink this installation down to 40GB and put it back on the > machine which right now has Ubuntu taking up all 160GB. > > I have read that ntfsresize may have some problems resizing Windows 7 > partitions, and also that sometimes machines ship in Suspend mode instead > of shutdown that can lead to boot problems. > > Can I safely use ntfsresize to shrink partition 3, and put the 3 partitions back > on the drive after my Ubuntu installation, and expect the machine to boot? > Or is that type 27 partition the suspend partition that needs to be first on > the drive? Anything else I should keep in mind? The type 27 partition is either an Acer laptop hidden rescue partition or a Windows RE hidden partition. In either case you do not need it at all. As far as booting goes, no it will NOT work. Windows booting is much more complicated than that. You will need to modify the NTFS boot sector to update it to the new physical location on the disk, you will need to update the new drive geometry information in the NTFS boot sector as well. You will then need to also edit Windows 7 setup itself so it knows about the new system and boots from it. I am afraid I have no idea how booting works in Windows 7 so you will have to search google for details of what you have to do but be prepared for a lot of pain... I would recommend you to install Windows from scratch in the new space you want to put it in, then copy over from the old disk image anything you want to keep to the new Windows installation then make a full backup and then discard your now no longer needed disk image... This will be a lot less hassle than trying to do what you are trying to do... Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/ |
|
From: Pete M. <mc...@pe...> - 2010-04-24 23:10:00
|
I have a hard drive image file with a Windows 7 installation that I
captured prior to first boot. It looks like this:
bigmedia:/var/extra1/images# losetup -fsr ./netbook-working-sda.img
/dev/loop0
bigmedia:/var/extra1/images# fdisk -lu /dev/loop0
Disk /dev/loop0: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders, total 312581808 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xdc7a3828
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/loop0p1 63 25173854 12586896 27 Unknown
/dev/loop0p2 * 25173855 25382699 104422+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/loop0p3 25382700 312579759 143598530 7 HPFS/NTFS
bigmedia:/var/extra1/images#
I want to shrink this installation down to 40GB and put it back on the
machine which right now has Ubuntu taking up all 160GB.
I have read that ntfsresize may have some problems resizing Windows 7
partitions, and also that sometimes machines ship in Suspend mode instead
of shutdown that can lead to boot problems.
Can I safely use ntfsresize to shrink partition 3, and put the 3 partitions back
on the drive after my Ubuntu installation, and expect the machine to boot?
Or is that type 27 partition the suspend partition that needs to be first on
the drive? Anything else I should keep in mind?
Thanks,
-Pete
|
|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2010-02-01 13:07:47
|
Hi, Why don't you just run ntfsdecrypt on the ddrescue obtained image?!? Or is the MFT damaged/missing so you cannot do that? Best regards, Anton On 31 Jan 2010, at 16:37, Miller, Shao wrote: > Good day to All, > > Thank you for NTFSProgs! > > Compiling 'ntfsdecrypt' took a while to track down all the needed dependencies, but now I've got it. > > My situation involves an HDD failure. First thing done was 'ddrescue' the disk to another known-good disk. Second thing done was run some NTFS file recovery software and recover files. I've managed to port the system to QEmu hardware (making use of WinVBlock and http://etherboot.org/wiki/appnotes/port_winnt_sanboot) and subsequently exported the .PFX file for the user with encrypted files. > > But of course, the recovered files are assumed plaintext; there're no $EFS attributes associated with the files which are actually encrypted. So I have some questions today: > - Is an $EFS attribute an NTFS stream? > - If so, does someone have a recommendation for NTFS file recovery software which includes recovery of NTFS streams? > - If not, is $EFS attributes only available in the $MFT? > - With the .PFX and the ciphertext versions of encrypted files, but no $EFS attribute, what is my best course of action? > > Of course, the 'ddrescue' image is still available to me for further possibilities. > > Thank you for your time and any advice you might have to offer, > > - Shao Miller -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/ |
|
From: Shao M. <Sha...@yr...> - 2010-02-01 13:07:19
|
Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > ...Why don't you just run ntfsdecrypt on the ddrescue obtained > image?!? Or is the MFT damaged/missing so you cannot do that? > Unfortunately, yes, big-time $MFT damage. ntfsls and Windows AUTOCHK.EXE (check-disk) both complain. :( I've gotten some tips from Yuval F. to try out. Perhaps I'll report back after trying them out. Thanks for your response, Anton! - Shao Miller |
|
From: Miller, S. <Sha...@yr...> - 2010-02-01 01:20:31
|
I am performing a manual search for $EFS attributes. It'll take a while (*sigh*), but sooner or later I'll find a couple that correspond to interesting files. Once obtained, how fortunate might I be if I undertake the following steps: - Encrypt a same-length file as the same user - Manually replace this file's ciphertext (on a disk byte level) with the target ciphertext - Manually replace the $EFS attribute (on a disk byte level) with the target $EFS attribute, including DDF Is it possible that this process could yield the original file? Thanks again, - Shao Miller -----Original Message----- From: Miller, Shao Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 11:37 To: lin...@li... Subject: $EFS Attribute Recovery Good day to All, Thank you for NTFSProgs! Compiling 'ntfsdecrypt' took a while to track down all the needed dependencies, but now I've got it. My situation involves an HDD failure. First thing done was 'ddrescue' the disk to another known-good disk. Second thing done was run some NTFS file recovery software and recover files. I've managed to port the system to QEmu hardware (making use of WinVBlock and http://etherboot.org/wiki/appnotes/port_winnt_sanboot) and subsequently exported the .PFX file for the user with encrypted files. But of course, the recovered files are assumed plaintext; there're no $EFS attributes associated with the files which are actually encrypted. So I have some questions today: - Is an $EFS attribute an NTFS stream? - If so, does someone have a recommendation for NTFS file recovery software which includes recovery of NTFS streams? - If not, is $EFS attributes only available in the $MFT? - With the .PFX and the ciphertext versions of encrypted files, but no $EFS attribute, what is my best course of action? Of course, the 'ddrescue' image is still available to me for further possibilities. Thank you for your time and any advice you might have to offer, - Shao Miller |
|
From: Miller, S. <Sha...@yr...> - 2010-01-31 16:38:01
|
Good day to All, Thank you for NTFSProgs! Compiling 'ntfsdecrypt' took a while to track down all the needed dependencies, but now I've got it. My situation involves an HDD failure. First thing done was 'ddrescue' the disk to another known-good disk. Second thing done was run some NTFS file recovery software and recover files. I've managed to port the system to QEmu hardware (making use of WinVBlock and http://etherboot.org/wiki/appnotes/port_winnt_sanboot) and subsequently exported the .PFX file for the user with encrypted files. But of course, the recovered files are assumed plaintext; there're no $EFS attributes associated with the files which are actually encrypted. So I have some questions today: - Is an $EFS attribute an NTFS stream? - If so, does someone have a recommendation for NTFS file recovery software which includes recovery of NTFS streams? - If not, is $EFS attributes only available in the $MFT? - With the .PFX and the ciphertext versions of encrypted files, but no $EFS attribute, what is my best course of action? Of course, the 'ddrescue' image is still available to me for further possibilities. Thank you for your time and any advice you might have to offer, - Shao Miller |
|
From: Nikos C. <re...@ar...> - 2009-11-17 10:26:55
|
To build ntfs-3g, the attr package is needed (the one that provides the libattr.so library and attr/xattr.h header). However, after building, is the library still needed? In other words, is it a build-time only dependency or also a runtime dependency? Because if I uninstall it (meaning that libattr.so* are also gone), ntfs-3g keeps functioning correctly. Are the specific features in ntfs-3g that will not function anymore without this library? |
|
From: Nikos C. <re...@ar...> - 2009-11-17 09:25:25
|
To build ntfs-3g, the attr package is needed (the one that provides the libattr.so library and attr/xattr.h header). However, after building, is the library still needed? In other words, is it a build-time only dependency or also a runtime dependency? Because if I uninstall it (meaning that libattr.so* are also gone), ntfs-3g keeps functioning correctly. Are the specific features in ntfs-3g that will not function anymore without this library? |
|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2009-09-25 20:29:58
|
Hi, Sorry for the delay in replying. The fully functional read-write kernel driver is at least for now a commercial offering. For details see: http://www.tuxera.com/ The standard Linux 2.6 kernel series contains a cut-down version which can only overwrite existing files but cannot create or delete files. Best regards, Anton On 25 Sep 2009, at 18:17, John Casteel wrote: > > I guess you didn't read my message. NTFS-3G is dog slow, doesn't > fit our needs. libntfs brags about fast reads/writes comparing to > ntfs-3g which I am wanting to test. This group is set for a kernel > level driver however libntfs is user-level... where is the dev tree > for the kernel level driver (not the ntfsprogs stuff)? I assume > only on Antons box? why would someone post me to another forum.. I > would have used that if that is what I wanted.. (not a newb). > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Gustavo Guillermo Perez <gu...@co...> > Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:38 AM > Subject: Re: [Linux-NTFS-User] Read-Write NTFS with kernel 2.6.27.27 > To: lin...@li... > > > El Martes, 22 de Septiembre de 2009, John Casteel escribió: > > I am a fairly new mailing list user, however very interested in > this kernel > > level driver. > Use the ntfs-3g package. has real RW features. > > :) > > I loaded the kernel level modules yuma posted in my 2.6.27.27 > kernel (Slax > > build if it matters). mounting a drive via *mount -o rw /dev/ > <device> > > /mnt/<dir>* which is sucessful, typing mount shows the mount path > and rw, > > however drive is readonly. Trying to write to the device and you > get > > read-only filesystem message. Looking at the device properties in > KDE > > shows that the permissions are set for Can View Contents only on > Owner, > > Forbidden on Group and Others . /var/log/messages shows kernel > NTFS volume > > version 3.1 (no errors) as does dmesg output. > > > > What kernel are the kernel modules tested with? > > > > Should there be write access? > > > > Am I doing something wrong (as I am new to this project)? > > > > Is this an active project (NTFS-3G is okay but not our > needs...Anton or > > other developers can respond I will fill him in privately..)? > > > > Thanks, > > John > > > > -- > Gustavo Guillermo Pérez > www.compunauta.com > Anuncios Gratis: http://anuncios.compunauta.net/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart > your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and > stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register > now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > Linux-NTFS-User mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-ntfs-user > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart > your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and > stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register > now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf_______________________________________________ > Linux-NTFS-User mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-ntfs-user Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/ |
|
From: John C. <jca...@gm...> - 2009-09-25 17:17:40
|
I guess you didn't read my message. NTFS-3G is dog slow, doesn't fit our needs. libntfs brags about fast reads/writes comparing to ntfs-3g which I am wanting to test. This group is set for a kernel level driver however libntfs is user-level... where is the dev tree for the kernel level driver (not the ntfsprogs stuff)? I assume only on Antons box? why would someone post me to another forum.. I would have used that if that is what I wanted.. (not a newb). ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Gustavo Guillermo Perez <gu...@co...> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:38 AM Subject: Re: [Linux-NTFS-User] Read-Write NTFS with kernel 2.6.27.27 To: lin...@li... El Martes, 22 de Septiembre de 2009, John Casteel escribió: > I am a fairly new mailing list user, however very interested in this kernel > level driver. Use the ntfs-3g package. has real RW features. :) > I loaded the kernel level modules yuma posted in my 2.6.27.27 kernel (Slax > build if it matters). mounting a drive via *mount -o rw /dev/<device> > /mnt/<dir>* which is sucessful, typing mount shows the mount path and rw, > however drive is readonly. Trying to write to the device and you get > read-only filesystem message. Looking at the device properties in KDE > shows that the permissions are set for Can View Contents only on Owner, > Forbidden on Group and Others . /var/log/messages shows kernel NTFS volume > version 3.1 (no errors) as does dmesg output. > > What kernel are the kernel modules tested with? > > Should there be write access? > > Am I doing something wrong (as I am new to this project)? > > Is this an active project (NTFS-3G is okay but not our needs...Anton or > other developers can respond I will fill him in privately..)? > > Thanks, > John -- Gustavo Guillermo Pérez www.compunauta.com Anuncios Gratis: http://anuncios.compunauta.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Linux-NTFS-User mailing list Lin...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-ntfs-user |
|
From: Gustavo G. P. <gu...@co...> - 2009-09-23 06:00:18
|
El Martes, 22 de Septiembre de 2009, John Casteel escribió: > I am a fairly new mailing list user, however very interested in this kernel > level driver. Use the ntfs-3g package. has real RW features. :) > I loaded the kernel level modules yuma posted in my 2.6.27.27 kernel (Slax > build if it matters). mounting a drive via *mount -o rw /dev/<device> > /mnt/<dir>* which is sucessful, typing mount shows the mount path and rw, > however drive is readonly. Trying to write to the device and you get > read-only filesystem message. Looking at the device properties in KDE > shows that the permissions are set for Can View Contents only on Owner, > Forbidden on Group and Others . /var/log/messages shows kernel NTFS volume > version 3.1 (no errors) as does dmesg output. > > What kernel are the kernel modules tested with? > > Should there be write access? > > Am I doing something wrong (as I am new to this project)? > > Is this an active project (NTFS-3G is okay but not our needs...Anton or > other developers can respond I will fill him in privately..)? > > Thanks, > John -- Gustavo Guillermo Pérez www.compunauta.com Anuncios Gratis: http://anuncios.compunauta.net/ |
|
From: John C. <jca...@gm...> - 2009-09-22 18:09:21
|
drive was originally formatted with gparted. formatted with mkfs.ntfs and instead of mount used ntfsmount. This allows read-write through the ntfs-progs package, but then isnt it writting through the user-space library libntfs.so.10.0.0 instead of the kernel modules uploaded? Am I right that mount would call the .ko's and ntfsmount would call libntfs... dont both have readwrite access now? On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM, John <jca...@gm...> wrote: > I am a fairly new mailing list user, however very interested in this kernel > level driver. > > I loaded the kernel level modules yuma posted in my 2.6.27.27 kernel (Slax > build if it matters). mounting a drive via *mount -o rw /dev/<device> > /mnt/<dir>* which is sucessful, typing mount shows the mount path and rw, > however drive is readonly. Trying to write to the device and you get > read-only filesystem message. Looking at the device properties in KDE shows > that the permissions are set for Can View Contents only on Owner, Forbidden > on Group and Others . /var/log/messages shows kernel NTFS volume version > 3.1 (no errors) as does dmesg output. > > What kernel are the kernel modules tested with? > > Should there be write access? > > Am I doing something wrong (as I am new to this project)? > > Is this an active project (NTFS-3G is okay but not our needs...Anton or > other developers can respond I will fill him in privately..)? > > Thanks, > John > > > |
|
From: John C. <jca...@gm...> - 2009-09-22 16:36:35
|
I am a fairly new mailing list user, however very interested in this kernel level driver. I loaded the kernel level modules yuma posted in my 2.6.27.27 kernel (Slax build if it matters). mounting a drive via *mount -o rw /dev/<device> /mnt/<dir>* which is sucessful, typing mount shows the mount path and rw, however drive is readonly. Trying to write to the device and you get read-only filesystem message. Looking at the device properties in KDE shows that the permissions are set for Can View Contents only on Owner, Forbidden on Group and Others . /var/log/messages shows kernel NTFS volume version 3.1 (no errors) as does dmesg output. What kernel are the kernel modules tested with? Should there be write access? Am I doing something wrong (as I am new to this project)? Is this an active project (NTFS-3G is okay but not our needs...Anton or other developers can respond I will fill him in privately..)? Thanks, John |
|
From: rafael c. <bom...@ho...> - 2009-08-12 20:24:11
|
hi.. I had a ntfs partition occupying all my 160GB hd I first used ntfsresize to resize it to 100GB and then used fdisk to resize the partition and to create another partition with the rest of the space but I think it was after I deleted and created the new partition, that neither mount or ntfsresize (I tryied to resize it again) recognize the resized ntfs (100GB) anymore my commands was like: sudo ntfsresize --size 100GB /dev/sda1 sudo fdisk /dev/sda # deleted the partition # created one partition to like 110GB, set active and fs type 7 (HPFS/NTFS) # created another partition with the rest of the space, fs type 7 too w -- to apply the changes to the partition table then I tryed sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/sda1 /media/win and I got an error: NTFS signature is missing. Failed to mount '/dev/sda1': Invalid argument The device '/dev/sda1' doesn't have a valid NTFS. ... what can I do to recover my ntfs partition? thanks _________________________________________________________________ Conheça os novos produtos Windows Live! Clique aqui. http://www.windowslive.com.br |
|
From: Rob B. <rob...@ms...> - 2009-08-07 17:31:12
|
The cygwin project has been working towards release of a 1.7 version. Under this release the windows devices are accessible via direct paths. For example, //?/GLOBALROOT/Device/Harddisk0/Partition1 is a direct path to the partition on hard disk 1. The reason this is useful is it can also be used to access shadow copies (e.g. //?/GLOBALROOT/Device/VolumeShadowCopy3). If ntfsclone can directly point to a shadow copy a clone of the partition can be taken with the machine online rather than forcing it to be booted to a boot CD. I've compiled ntfsprogs 2.0 under cygwin 1.7 but it assigns its own devices using the win32_io.c file. Does anyone know how the win32_io.c could be modified to allow access to these global paths rather than forcing the /dev/hdaX links? Rob |
|
From: Mike A. <ya...@ya...> - 2009-03-06 20:45:27
|
Hello, I'm getting an ERANGE error when I write files in a particular way on an NTFS 3.1 disk using ntfsprogs-2.0.0. Attached please find a simple perl script to reproduce this problem. I run it as: rm /ntfsdisk/foo; ./mjatest.pl > /ntfsdisk/foo When I turn on debugging I see this on the fourth write: WRITE[134720624] 4096 bytes to 4096 ntfs_attr_pwrite(): Entering for inode 0x2ee1, attr 0x80, pos 0x1000, count 0x1000. __ntfs_attr_truncate(): Entering for inode 0x2ee1, attr 0x80. ntfs_non_resident_attr_expand(): Entering for inode 0x2ee1, attr 0x80, new size 8192, current size 4096. ntfs_attr_map_runlist(): Entering for inode 0x2ee1, attr 0x80, vcn 0x1. ntfs_attr_find(): Entering for attribute type 0x80. ntfs_mapping_pairs_decompress(): Entering for attr 0x80. dst: NTFS-fs DEBUG: Dumping runlist (values in hex): VCN LCN Run length 0 1ddc169 1 1 LCN_RL_NOT_MAPPED 0 (runlist end) src: NTFS-fs DEBUG: Dumping runlist (values in hex): VCN LCN Run length 0 1ddc169 1 1 LCN_ENOENT 0 (runlist end) Run lists overlap. Cannot merge! Failed to merge runlists. Failed to map runlist. __ntfs_attr_truncate(): Failed. ntfs_attr_pwrite(): Attribute extend failed. ntfs_attr_pwrite returned -1 bytes instead of requested 4096 bytes (offset 4096). unique: 152, error: -34 (Numerical result out of range), outsize: 16 unique: 153, opcode: WRITE (16), nodeid: 7, insize: 4160 The complete debug output is also attached. My configuration is: Ubuntu 6.06.2 LTS (GNU/Linux 2.6.15-53-686) fuse-2.7.4 ntfsprogs-2.0.0 Chkdisk on Windows XP SP2 reports that the NTFS disk is OK. Can you help? |
|
From: <ma...@we...> - 2008-08-18 00:44:53
|
Hello, I have a serios problem using ntfsresize: 1) I made an image from my partition with linux "dd" 2) There where 2 partitions on that image, the system image was the first one 3) I removed the second partition, the images was bootable in VMWare 4) with parted I removed all parttitions and recreated a larger first partition (same starting sektor), the image was bootable in VMWare 5) I used ntfsresize to resize the ntfs-filesystem: losetup --offset 32256 /dev/loop0 /vmware/SBS-flat.vmdk ntfsresize -s 73373155840 --no-action /dev/loop0 ntfsresize -s 73373155840 /dev/loop0 losetup -d /dev/loop0 6) Now the image ist no more bootable, chkdsk tells about serios errors and a "dir c:" in the rescue-mode shows nothing Do you have an Idea what I did wrong? Thanks in advance Holger ________________________________________________________________________ StudiVZ, MeinVZ, StayFriends,... die größten Communities treffen sich im WEB.DE MultiMessenger! https://produkte.web.de/messenger/?lp=1/&did=3110 |
