|
From: Szakacsits S. <sz...@si...> - 2004-03-09 20:50:57
|
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, [ISO-8859-1] François Dupoux wrote: > On linux-ntfs.sf.net, we can download a driver patch that applies > against 2.4.24. But there is no patch against linux-2.4.25. Do you know > when this verion is planned ? I wait for this patch, because I want to > update the kernel of SysRescCd. It still has kernel 2.4.24, and I would > like to update to 2.4.25. The NTFS patch is missing for the moment. Sorry, I don't know. Usually Pawel makes/made the 2.4 pathes but Anton corrects me if I'm wrong and about the status. BTW, I have (also) problems sending emails to linux-ntfs-dev and apparently other persons too. Emails are rejected. Anton, perhaps you know what's going on at SF? Let's see if this email arrives ... Szaka |
|
From: Pawel K. <pk...@be...> - 2004-03-09 21:22:55
|
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Fran=E7ois Dupoux wrote: > > > On linux-ntfs.sf.net, we can download a driver patch that applies > > against 2.4.24. But there is no patch against linux-2.4.25. Do you know > > when this verion is planned ? I wait for this patch, because I want to > > update the kernel of SysRescCd. It still has kernel 2.4.24, and I would > > like to update to 2.4.25. The NTFS patch is missing for the moment. > > Sorry, I don't know. Usually Pawel makes/made the 2.4 pathes but Anton > corrects me if I'm wrong and about the status. Sorry, I had no time to do this. I hope to make a diff and push it to sf tonight. pkot --=20 mailto:pk...@be... http://www.gnokii.org/ |
|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2004-03-09 23:01:12
|
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > BTW, I have (also) problems sending emails to linux-ntfs-dev and > apparently other persons too. Emails are rejected. Anton, perhaps > you know what's going on at SF? Let's see if this email arrives ... No idea I am afraid. They never even get to the admin interface for me to decide what to do with. I have _never_ rejected an email. I either just "Approve" or "Discard" and I _only_ discard what is clearly spam (I discard about 10 messages per day which is why the list needs to stay moderated otherwise it would fill up the archives with spam instead of ntfs messages). I just relaxed the restrictions, so now the message: - must have maximum 10 recipients in To: and CC: - must name either lin...@li... or lin...@li... in either To: or CC: - must not exceed 100kiB in size including attachments That's all I think. Should any messages not get through I would strongly suggest to raise a support request with SF.net giving them a copy of the email you sent and any replies you received. Definitely wasn't me rejecting it! Oh, I also changed an option: From now on all posts going through the list will get an explicit Reply-To: header with the list address in it. Should make people happier I hope as on replies people should now no longer get the message twice if they are in the To: or CC: on the original message but we will see how it works out... Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
|
From: Philipp T. <pt...@su...> - 2004-03-10 12:30:40
|
* Anton Altaparmakov (ai...@ca...) [20040309 23:45]: > Oh, I also changed an option: From now on all posts going through the > list will get an explicit Reply-To: header with the list address in it. Sorry, but IMO that is a grave mistake. For the gory details, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Philipp -- Philipp Thomas <pt...@su...> SUSE LINUX AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuremberg, Germany |
|
From: Pawel K. <pk...@be...> - 2004-03-11 09:45:31
|
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Philipp Thomas wrote: > * Anton Altaparmakov (ai...@ca...) [20040309 23:45]: > > > Oh, I also changed an option: From now on all posts going through the > > list will get an explicit Reply-To: header with the list address in it. > > Sorry, but IMO that is a grave mistake. For the gory details, see > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html I think there are as many people that agree with this argumentation as that don't agree. Personally I think they are void and prefer setting Reply-To with the list address. Anyway, the setting does not work. pkot -- mailto:pk...@be... http://www.gnokii.org/ |
|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2004-03-11 09:57:40
|
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 09:27, Pawel Kot wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Philipp Thomas wrote: > > * Anton Altaparmakov (ai...@ca...) [20040309 23:45]: > > > > > Oh, I also changed an option: From now on all posts going through the > > > list will get an explicit Reply-To: header with the list address in it. > > > > Sorry, but IMO that is a grave mistake. For the gory details, see > > > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > I think there are as many people that agree with this argumentation as > that don't agree. Personally I think they are void and prefer setting > Reply-To with the list address. > > Anyway, the setting does not work. You are right it doesn't. I have now switched it off, just in case it was doing something else... Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
|
From: Philipp T. <pt...@su...> - 2004-03-11 10:15:27
|
* Pawel Kot (pk...@be...) [20040311 10:27]: > Personally I think they are void and prefer setting > Reply-To with the list address. Maybe on a low volume list like ntfs-dev it doesn't harm much, but on a high volume list like suse-linux-e the effect would be desastrous. Think about vacation programs that don't ignore mailing lists or other reasons that lead to autoreplies (mailbox full, receipient unknown, misconfigured system etc.). Now think what happens if the go to the list .... > Anyway, the setting does not work. ;-))))) Philipp -- Philipp Thomas <pth at suse dot de> SUSE LINUX AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuremberg, Germany |
|
NTFS patch 2.1.6a for kernel 2.4.25 (was Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re:
linux-ntfs patch for linux-2.4.25)
From: Pawel K. <pk...@be...> - 2004-03-09 23:52:30
|
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, [ISO-8859-1] François Dupoux wrote: > > > On linux-ntfs.sf.net, we can download a driver patch that applies > > against 2.4.24. But there is no patch against linux-2.4.25. Do you know > > when this verion is planned ? I wait for this patch, because I want to > > update the kernel of SysRescCd. It still has kernel 2.4.24, and I would > > like to update to 2.4.25. The NTFS patch is missing for the moment. Here it is. Available from http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/. Compiled, depmoded, not booted, but should work with no difference to 2.4.24 version. pkot PS. I hope transfer encoding will be sf-friendly this time. -- mailto:pk...@be... http://www.gnokii.org/ |
