In the above patch I have mentioned what are the changes from the version
1. Also since most of the lines of the patch were a change due to some
indentation error, the whole patch appears as the diff.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 4:15 PM Greg KH <gr...@li...> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 03:59:58PM +0530, Manas Ghandat wrote:
> > Added a check to the compression_unit so that out of bound doesn't occur.
> >
> > Fix patching issues in version 2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manas Ghandat <gha...@gm...>
> > Reported-by: syz...@sy...
> > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4768a8f039aa677897d0
> > ---
> > fs/ntfs/inode.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ntfs/inode.c b/fs/ntfs/inode.c
> > index 6c3f38d66579..a657322874ed 100644
> > --- a/fs/ntfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/ntfs/inode.c
> > @@ -1077,6 +1077,15 @@ static int ntfs_read_locked_inode(struct inode
> *vi)
> > goto unm_err_out;
> > }
> > if (a->data.non_resident.compression_unit)
> {
> > + if
> (a->data.non_resident.compression_unit +
> > + vol->cluster_size_bits >
> 32) {
> > + ntfs_error(vi->i_sb,
> > + "Found
> non-standard compression unit (%u). Cannot handle this.",
> > +
> a->data.non_resident.compression_unit
> > + );
> > + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + goto unm_err_out;
> > + }
> > ni->itype.compressed.block_size =
> 1U <<
> >
> (a->data.non_resident.
> > compression_unit +
> > --
> > 2.37.2
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
> a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
> to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
> writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
> created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
> in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
> kernel tree.
>
> You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
> as indicated below:
>
> - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
> did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
> Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
> kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
> needs to be done here to properly describe this.
>
>
> If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
> how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
> Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
> from other developers.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h's patch email bot
>
|