linux-mips-commits

[Linux-mips-commits]CVS: linux/scripts mkdep.c,1.2,NONE split-include.c,1.1.1.1,NONE

[Bradley D. L. <br...@us...>]

Update of /cvsroot/linux-mips/linux/scripts
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv21264

Removed Files:
	mkdep.c split-include.c 
Log Message:
These don't look very special.


--- mkdep.c DELETED ---

--- split-include.c DELETED ---

Re: [Linux-mips-commits]CVS: linux/scripts mkdep.c,1.2,NONE split-include.c,1.1.1.1,NONE

[Bradley D. L. <br...@lt...>]

Er... maybe they were, since oss has them this way. Anyone know what's up
with these?

Regards,
Brad

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <br...@us...>
To: <lin...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 11:30 AM
Subject: [Linux-mips-commits]CVS: linux/scripts mkdep.c,1.2,NONE
split-include.c,1.1.1.1,NONE


> Update of /cvsroot/linux-mips/linux/scripts
> In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv21264
>
> Removed Files:
> mkdep.c split-include.c
> Log Message:
> These don't look very special.
>
>
> --- mkdep.c DELETED ---
>
> --- split-include.c DELETED ---
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mips-commits mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-mips-commits
>

Re: [Linux-mips-commits]CVS: linux/scripts mkdep.c,1.2,NONE split-include.c,1.1.1.1,NONE

[James S. <jsi...@tr...>]

> Er... maybe they were, since oss has them this way. Anyone know what's up
> with these?

I have no idea. It is what is in the OSS tree. 

Re: [Linux-mips-commits]CVS: linux/scripts mkdep.c,1.2,NONE split-include.c,1.1.1.1,NONE

[Bradley D. L. <br...@lt...>]

I've e-mailed Ralf asking about them, along with the lib/string.c diff.

Regards,
Brad

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Simmons" <jsi...@tr...>
To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <br...@lt...>
Cc: <lin...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-mips-commits]CVS: linux/scripts mkdep.c,1.2,NONE
split-include.c,1.1.1.1,NONE


>
> > Er... maybe they were, since oss has them this way. Anyone know what's
up
> > with these?
>
> I have no idea. It is what is in the OSS tree.