|
From: Peter M. <pm...@go...> - 2012-06-18 19:17:20
|
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mimi Zohar <zo...@li...> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 08:40 -0700, Peter Moody wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Mimi Zohar <zo...@li...> wrote: >> >> > Thanks Dmitry. Both this version and Peter Moody's post, which uses the >> > existing upstream audit_log_d_path() and d_path(), use the full pathname >> > only for auditing purposes. >> >> I haven't seen any response from Al, has there been any answer offlist >> that you know of? > > No. Let's assume, unless we hear differently, it is ok. I was thinking > something like the following, where get_d_path() is similar to > audit_log_d_path(). This would definitely work for me. -- Peter Moody Google 1.650.253.7306 Security Engineer pgp:0xC3410038 |