|
From: Mimi Z. <zo...@li...> - 2012-06-15 02:15:48
|
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 14:32 +0200, Jordi Cucurull Juan wrote: > Dear all, > > Recently I have started looking at IMA to explore the possibilities that > it offers. I have a question regarding the measurement list and the > files measured. > > The point is that it does not seem possible to uniquely identify a file > with the information in the field "file-hint". The absolute path of the > file is not always available, hence in many cases several entries with > the same file name will appear. This makes impossible to distinguish if > two entries with the same file-hint value correspond to two different > files in the file system or to a file that has been modified. > > Is it possible to include the file name with the complete absolute path > in the measurement list? If not, is there a reason for it? (maybe memory > used by the list?) > > Thanks and best regards, > Jordi. Yes, this is a common complaint, which we started to address with additional metadata (eg. uid/gid, LSM object/subject labels) - http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=25460938, but haven't yet upstreamed. At the time, using d_path() in the critical code path was not permitted. Perhaps things have changed. This exact question was just asked on the LSM mailing list, but has not yet been answered. Mimi |