|
From: Amruta G. G. <am...@cs...> - 2009-12-01 15:23:45
|
Thanks Reiner, Seiji for the reply. I might use a non-XML format, since it would suffice my purpose. Regards, Amruta On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:05:31 +0900 Seiji Munetoh <sei...@gm...> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Amruta G. Gokhale > <am...@cs...> wrote: > > The IBM web-page given here -- > > > http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/pages/ssd_ima.index.html/$FILE/response.xml > > -- illustrates a sample response sent from prover to verifier. My > > question is, do I need to use XML to exchange messages between > prover > > and verifier? (I suppose XML was used to make it language > independent > > and platform independent.. are there other benefits of using XML?) > > For your reference, > TCG has been defined several XML schema to describe these messages. > > http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/resources/tcg_xml_schemas/ > > They are much more complicated. > Of course, If you do not need any interoperability, you can use any > format > what you like. :-) > > We had been developed Open Platform Trust Services (OpenPTS) based on > these schema. > > regards > -- > Seiji Munetoh |