From: Jarkko S. <jar...@li...> - 2017-09-15 17:18:46
|
Hi Many people were kicked out from the SourceForge mailing list in the July because SF required a resubscription, including non-human users, such as patchwork. We decided to create a new mailing list lin...@vg... to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies. Otherwise, the maintainer hierarchy etc. will stay the same. It is all documented here: http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity >From now on use this list for patches and discussion instead of the legacy list. Thank you. /Jarkko |
From: Peter H. <pet...@gm...> - 2017-09-15 17:21:33
|
Am 15. September 2017 10:18:25 GMT-07:00 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen <jar...@li...>: >Hi > >Many people were kicked out from the SourceForge mailing list in the >July because SF required a resubscription, including non-human users, >such as patchwork. > >We decided to create a new mailing list lin...@vg... Of course it's lin...@vg... (Cc'ed) >to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies. >Otherwise, the maintainer hierarchy etc. will stay the same. > >It is all documented here: > >http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity > >From now on use this list for patches and discussion instead of the >legacy list. > >Thank you. > >/Jarkko > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >_______________________________________________ >tpmdd-devel mailing list >tpm...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel -- Sent from my mobile |
From: Jarkko S. <jar...@li...> - 2017-09-15 17:35:10
|
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:21:16AM -0700, Peter Huewe wrote: > > > Am 15. September 2017 10:18:25 GMT-07:00 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen <jar...@li...>: > >Hi > > > >Many people were kicked out from the SourceForge mailing list in the > >July because SF required a resubscription, including non-human users, > >such as patchwork. > > > >We decided to create a new mailing list lin...@vg... > > Of course it's > lin...@vg... > (Cc'ed) D'oh, yes :-) /Jarkko |
From: Joe P. <jo...@pe...> - 2017-09-15 17:25:49
|
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:18 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Hi > > Many people were kicked out from the SourceForge mailing list in the > July because SF required a resubscription, including non-human users, > such as patchwork. > > We decided to create a new mailing list lin...@vg... > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies. > Otherwise, the maintainer hierarchy etc. will stay the same. > > It is all documented here: > > http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity > > From now on use this list for patches and discussion instead of the > legacy list. And is there to be an update to the MAINTAINERS file entries? Extended Verification Module (EVM) L: lin...@li... L: lin...@vg... INTEGRITY MEASUREMENT ARCHITECTURE (IMA) L: lin...@li... L: lin...@li... L: lin...@vg... TPM DEVICE DRIVER L: tpm...@li... (moderated for non-subscribers) TPM IBM_VTPM DEVICE DRIVER L: tpm...@li... (moderated for non-subscribers) |
From: Jarkko S. <jar...@li...> - 2017-09-15 17:36:47
|
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:25:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:18 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Hi > > > > Many people were kicked out from the SourceForge mailing list in the > > July because SF required a resubscription, including non-human users, > > such as patchwork. > > > > We decided to create a new mailing list lin...@vg... > > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies. > > Otherwise, the maintainer hierarchy etc. will stay the same. > > > > It is all documented here: > > > > http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity > > > > From now on use this list for patches and discussion instead of the > > legacy list. > > And is there to be an update to the MAINTAINERS file entries? > > Extended Verification Module (EVM) > L: lin...@li... > L: lin...@vg... > > INTEGRITY MEASUREMENT ARCHITECTURE (IMA) > L: lin...@li... > L: lin...@li... > L: lin...@vg... > > TPM DEVICE DRIVER > L: tpm...@li... (moderated for non-subscribers) > > TPM IBM_VTPM DEVICE DRIVER > L: tpm...@li... (moderated for non-subscribers) Yes, I'll get onto it. BTW, do we need two entries for TPM in the MAINTAINERS file or can I merge those? /Jarkko |
From: Joe P. <jo...@pe...> - 2017-09-15 17:40:24
|
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:36 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:25:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:18 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: [] > > > We decided to create a new mailing list lin...@vg... > > > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies. [] > > And is there to be an update to the MAINTAINERS file entries? [] > Yes, I'll get onto it. BTW, do we need two entries for TPM in the > MAINTAINERS file or can I merge those? As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections, I think you need both entries. |
From: Peter H. <pet...@gm...> - 2017-09-15 17:47:30
|
Am 15. September 2017 10:40:14 GMT-07:00 schrieb Joe Perches <jo...@pe...>: >On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:36 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:25:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:18 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >[] >> > > We decided to create a new mailing list >lin...@vg... >> > > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross >dependencies. >[] >> > And is there to be an update to the MAINTAINERS file entries? >[] >> Yes, I'll get onto it. BTW, do we need two entries for TPM in the >> MAINTAINERS file or can I merge those? > >As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections, >I think you need both entries. Try to get a hold of ashley and ask whether she is actively maintaining. While updating Maintainers I vote for removing Marcel Selhorst for tpm. You can keep me for now :) Peter > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >_______________________________________________ >tpmdd-devel mailing list >tpm...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel -- Sent from my mobile |
From: Jarkko S. <jar...@li...> - 2017-09-15 17:57:36
|
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:47:06AM -0700, Peter Huewe wrote: > > > Am 15. September 2017 10:40:14 GMT-07:00 schrieb Joe Perches <jo...@pe...>: > >On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:36 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:25:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:18 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >[] > >> > > We decided to create a new mailing list > >lin...@vg... > >> > > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross > >dependencies. > >[] > >> > And is there to be an update to the MAINTAINERS file entries? > >[] > >> Yes, I'll get onto it. BTW, do we need two entries for TPM in the > >> MAINTAINERS file or can I merge those? > > > >As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections, > >I think you need both entries. > > Try to get a hold of ashley and ask whether she is actively maintaining. > > While updating Maintainers I vote for removing Marcel Selhorst for tpm. > > You can keep me for now :) > Peter During the last bit less than couple of years I've been maintaining TPM and a bit less than four years I've been contributing I've never heard anything of Ashley. What is the expiration time? /JArkko |
From: Joe P. <jo...@pe...> - 2017-09-15 18:02:01
|
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:57 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:47:06AM -0700, Peter Huewe wrote: > > Am 15. September 2017 10:40:14 GMT-07:00 schrieb Joe Perches <jo...@pe...>: > > > As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections, > > > I think you need both entries. > > > > Try to get a hold of ashley and ask whether she is actively maintaining. > > > > While updating Maintainers I vote for removing Marcel Selhorst for tpm. > > > > You can keep me for now :) > > Peter > > During the last bit less than couple of years I've been maintaining > TPM and a bit less than four years I've been contributing I've never > heard anything of Ashley. > > What is the expiration time? There is no fixed time at all. Generally when the email bounces or when the maintainer resigns. (involuntarily or not...) It seems a couple years since Ashley signed anything and five years since Marcel Selhorst signed anything. It's polite to add a CREDITS entry when removing inactive maintainers. |
From: Ken G. <kg...@li...> - 2017-09-15 20:08:15
|
Newbie question: Do I have to subscribe, or are email addresses being migrated? On 9/15/2017 1:18 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Hi > > Many people were kicked out from the SourceForge mailing list in the > July because SF required a resubscription, including non-human users, > such as patchwork. > > We decided to create a new mailing list lin...@vg... > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies. > Otherwise, the maintainer hierarchy etc. will stay the same. > > It is all documented here: > > http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity > > From now on use this list for patches and discussion instead of the > legacy list. |
From: Peter H. <pet...@gm...> - 2017-09-15 20:33:24
|
Am 15. September 2017 13:07:58 GMT-07:00 schrieb Ken Goldman <kg...@li...>: >Newbie question: Do I have to subscribe, or are email addresses being >migrated You have to subscribe yourself. Due to the new privacy regulations I do not have access to any member information anymore on the old list. Just send a plaintext email with the body/text subscribe linux-integrity to maj...@vg... Peter > >On 9/15/2017 1:18 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> Hi >> >> Many people were kicked out from the SourceForge mailing list in the >> July because SF required a resubscription, including non-human users, >> such as patchwork. >> >> We decided to create a new mailing list >lin...@vg... >> to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies. >> Otherwise, the maintainer hierarchy etc. will stay the same. >> >> It is all documented here: >> >> http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity >> >> From now on use this list for patches and discussion instead of the >> legacy list. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >_______________________________________________ >tpmdd-devel mailing list >tpm...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel -- Sent from my mobile |
From: Jarkko S. <jar...@li...> - 2017-09-15 21:47:26
|
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:01:51AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:57 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:47:06AM -0700, Peter Huewe wrote: > > > Am 15. September 2017 10:40:14 GMT-07:00 schrieb Joe Perches <jo...@pe...>: > > > > As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections, > > > > I think you need both entries. > > > > > > Try to get a hold of ashley and ask whether she is actively maintaining. > > > > > > While updating Maintainers I vote for removing Marcel Selhorst for tpm. > > > > > > You can keep me for now :) > > > Peter > > > > During the last bit less than couple of years I've been maintaining > > TPM and a bit less than four years I've been contributing I've never > > heard anything of Ashley. > > > > What is the expiration time? > > There is no fixed time at all. > Generally when the email bounces or when the maintainer resigns. > (involuntarily or not...) > > It seems a couple years since Ashley signed anything and five years > since Marcel Selhorst signed anything. > > It's polite to add a CREDITS entry when removing inactive maintainers. The file ends: " # Don't add your name here, unless you really _are_ after Marc # alphabetically. Leonard used to be very proud of being the # last entry, and he'll get positively pissed if he can't even # be second-to-last. (and this file really _is_ supposed to be # in alphabetic order) " So where do I should add?-) /Jarkko |
From: Joe P. <jo...@pe...> - 2017-09-15 21:55:22
|
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 14:47 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:01:51AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: [] > > It's polite to add a CREDITS entry when removing inactive maintainers. > > The file ends: > > " > # Don't add your name here, unless you really _are_ after Marc > # alphabetically. Leonard used to be very proud of being the > # last entry, and he'll get positively pissed if he can't even > # be second-to-last. (and this file really _is_ supposed to be > # in alphabetic order) > " > > So where do I should add?-) http://www.varley.net/Pages/Manhattan.htm |