Re: [Linux-igd-devel] [linux-igd] Release goals and roadmap...

[Daniel J B. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi Juho and (all CC'd),

This sounds like a good post-1.0 task, when there is time to make some
larger changes.

Thanks for the feedback - I'll get a 0.95 release out the door soon,
then work on some security/robustness improvements for the 1.0
release. As always, feedback and ideas are welcome along the way ;-) .

Dan

On 09/08/06, Juho V=E4h=E4-Herttua <juh...@tk...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm back and I think automake/autotools support is very welcome. I
> had some small scripts together earlier on but they were in no way
> finished (didn't install the library in right place) and didn't get
> committed. So I would be all for some better build system but other
> opinions are of course still welcome. And I think Daniel has a good
> list of things to do so far after the 0.95 gets out.
>
> Just my two euro cents.
>
>
> Juho
>
>
> On 8.8.2006, at 19:43, Rosfran Borges wrote:
> >
> >    It's nice your initiative, Blueman. Among these items you noted,
> > there are another things we can priorize too, like the 'automake/
> > autotools' support on compilation and library dependencies. I can
> > do this, if everybody agree with it: so we can use it to
> > generate .deb packages.
> >
> > []'s
> > Rosfran Borges
> >
> > On 8/7/06, Daniel J Blueman <dan...@gm...> wrote: Hi guys,
> >
> > I sent this message [1] to the linux-igd devel list, but had not
> > response yet. If no-one objects, I'll cut a 0.95 release over the next
> > few days, then move on to the next steps below.
> >
> > Feedback is welcome - please CC lin...@li...,
> > so everyone gets the info (eventually).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >   Daniel
> >
> > --- [1]
> >
> > I've been testing and committing some updates to the project lately
> > and wanted to discuss release plans.
> >
> > So far, there are a few items I'm aware of:
> >
> > 1. connection data counters do not work (bug)
> > 2. use of unbounded strings, unchecked calls, ip address strings and
> > other potential security-related things - including memory (valgrind)
> > bugs, which I've fixed most non-subtle ones already
> > 3. outstanding patches
> > 4. subversion migration (?)
> >
> > It would be good to do a 0.95 release, as-is. At least people can get
> > something officially updated.
> >
> > Following this, I'd like to get some other security-related items
> > tightened up and I have a patch half-cooked for item #1 - this should
> > take a couple of weeks, then after a couple of weeks of code being
> > tested to some degree, perhaps a grand 1.0 release?
> >
> > Following this, it would be great to get Nektarios's excellent patches
> > in and iron out any issues; I've seen at least one potential one,
> > which I'll raise separately - (I like the "harmonizing" concept I
> > think Juho mentioned) and release version 1.2/1.5/2.0 depending on how
> > significant our renewed energy and redefined image is.
> >
> > The route to 1.0 needn't take as long this I mention, but it's good to
> > not have to rush. I was looking at subversion migration in the future,
> > since CVS is a pain without setting up the SSH keys correctly and if
> > you don't have full net access.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> > --
> > Daniel J Blueman
> >
>
>


--=20
Daniel J Blueman