Re: [Linux-igd-devel] [linux-igd] Release goals and roadmap...
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
krazydime
|
From: Eric W. <eb...@er...> - 2006-08-08 10:51:22
|
Sounds good to me. Eric >-----Original Message----- >From: Daniel J Blueman [mailto:dan...@gm...] >Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 8:09 AM >To: and...@us...; >ew...@us...; hfm...@us...; >ju...@us...; kra...@us...; >mhy...@us...; my...@us...; >ro...@us... >Cc: lin...@li... >Subject: [linux-igd] Release goals and roadmap... > >Hi guys, > >I sent this message [1] to the linux-igd devel list, but had >not response yet. If no-one objects, I'll cut a 0.95 release >over the next few days, then move on to the next steps below. > >Feedback is welcome - please CC lin...@li..., >so everyone gets the info (eventually). > >Thanks, > Daniel > >--- [1] > >I've been testing and committing some updates to the project >lately and wanted to discuss release plans. > >So far, there are a few items I'm aware of: > > 1. connection data counters do not work (bug) 2. use of >unbounded strings, unchecked calls, ip address strings and >other potential security-related things - including memory >(valgrind) bugs, which I've fixed most non-subtle ones already > 3. outstanding patches 4. subversion migration (?) > >It would be good to do a 0.95 release, as-is. At least people >can get something officially updated. > >Following this, I'd like to get some other security-related >items tightened up and I have a patch half-cooked for item #1 >- this should take a couple of weeks, then after a couple of >weeks of code being tested to some degree, perhaps a grand 1.0 release? > >Following this, it would be great to get Nektarios's excellent >patches in and iron out any issues; I've seen at least one >potential one, which I'll raise separately - (I like the >"harmonizing" concept I think Juho mentioned) and release >version 1.2/1.5/2.0 depending on how significant our renewed >energy and redefined image is. > >The route to 1.0 needn't take as long this I mention, but it's >good to not have to rush. I was looking at subversion >migration in the future, since CVS is a pain without setting >up the SSH keys correctly and if you don't have full net access. > >What do you guys think? >-- >Daniel J Blueman |