Re: [Linux-hls-devel] Fixed bug in /proc/HLS/tasks

[Luca A. <luc...@em...>]

On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 12:47, John Regehr wrote:
> > reservation, hence I can confirm that times are expressed in 100ns
> > units. (this will probably change in the future, but for the moment you
> > can work with 100ns).
> 
> Would microseconds be more appropriate?  They are pretty intuitive for me.
> When stuffing microseconds into an unsigned 32-bit int you can represent
> time intervals up to a little over an hour.
I fully agree, here.

But I'd like to do the change "in the Right Way (TM)", modifying the
semantic of HLSSetTimer(). But I want to study the effects of such
change, first...

Anyway, this is the next item on my todo list.

				Luca
-- 
_____________________________________________________________________________
 Copy this in your signature, if you think it is important:
                                N O    W A R ! ! !



--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f

Sponsor:
Con KLM puoi risparmiare fino a 20 Euro sul tuo biglietto aereo prenotando on line per Usa, Europa e il resto del mondo
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=1259&d=28-8