Re: [Linux-hls-devel] Fixed bug in /proc/HLS/tasks

[John R. <re...@cs...>]

> reservation, hence I can confirm that times are expressed in 100ns
> units. (this will probably change in the future, but for the moment you
> can work with 100ns).

Would microseconds be more appropriate?  They are pretty intuitive for me.
When stuffing microseconds into an unsigned 32-bit int you can represent
time intervals up to a little over an hour.  This is probably long enough
for most things people do with kernel schedulers.  If someone is
scheduling events for more than an hour in the future, they're probably
using cron, not HLS!

John