From: dave p. <dpe...@gm...> - 2024-09-03 15:00:38
|
Hi Michael, Yes that is normal - your Pi3 is probably based on a bcm2710 SoC which has the same line-names as Pi4/5. Raspberry Pi made a couple of Pi3 variants based on different SoCs. The table labelled p3 is for the bcm2387 variant. I should change the names of the table variables to be just 0,1 and 2 to avoid confusion. cheers, -Dave On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 19:00, Michael Schwingen <mi...@sc...> wrote: > On 28.08.24 15:37, dave penkler wrote: > > Hi, > > The tables come from the different RPi device trees. Earlier Pi3A+, > > Pi3B+ based on bcm2837 had the same DT as Pi2B based on bcm2836 but > > with gpio14 and 15 called TXD1 and RXD1 instead of TXD0 and RXD0 as > > for the Pi2B. The bcm2710 and bcm2711 are all like table index 2. As > > we have no clean way to test what system we are running on we try the > > three different tables from the oldest to newest. > > That approach works fine for me - however, it feels strange that the Pi3 > uses the Pi4/5 table, while the attempt to use the Pi3 table fails. > > Is that normal? > > > cu > > Michael > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-gpib-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general > |