|
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2003-03-06 08:35:37
|
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, James Simmons wrote:
> > > We should split the monitor programing stuff out from stuff like bpp etc.
> > > Now if you think about it we can do things like change the bpp without
> > > having to redo the monitor programming. This is the flaw with the old and
> > > even the new api.
> >
> > You could have done that from the beginning. Just look at which fields have
> > changed and which haven't.
>
> I should of but didn't because I knew driver would take teh path of lest
> resistance to port there drivers. TO much change would have made the
> current situtation much much worst.
One other reason why this isn't done is because X may interfere with it. If we
don't do a full register update, but change the parts that need a change only,
we will see less flickering (no PLL reprogramming), but we will suffer if X
doesn't restore the registers to the exact same values they were before.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li...
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|