|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2003-03-06 07:37:14
|
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:22:26PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > > Hi, > > while waiting on these updates I updated matroxfb a bit > > (ftp://platan.vc.cvut.cz/pub/linux/matrox-latest/matroxfb-2.5.63.gz), > > so that it now uses fb_* for cfb modes, and putcs/... hooks for > > text mode. I have still dozen of changes in fbcon.c which I have > > to eliminate (mainly logo painting and cursor handling - for now > > I still use revc method, mainly because of I did not make into it yet). > > I grabbed your latest patch and started to merge it with my latest work on > the matrox driver. As soon as I'm done merging my matrox changes I will > send you a patch right away. > > > My main concern now is 12x22 font... Accelerator setup > > is so costly for each separate painted character that for 8bpp > > accelerated version is even slower than unaccelerated one :-( > > (and almost twice as slow when compared with 2.4.x). > > Try the latest patch I released. > > > And one (or two...) generic questions: why is not pseudo_palette > > u32* pseudo_palette, or even directly u32 pseudo_palette[17] ? > > pseudo_palette was originally designed to be a pointer to some kind of > data for color register programming. For example many PPC graphics cards > have a color register region. Now you could have that point to Does this correspond to the LUT i have in my boards ? BTW, what is the point in having a pseudo_palette if you can store the colors in the onchip LUT table. Friendly, Sven Luther |