|
From: Antonino D. <ad...@po...> - 2003-03-06 01:17:06
|
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 06:21, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > James Simmons wrote: > > I disagree that fbset is the solution to all things. The problem is > > fbcon_resize is severally broken. The reality is that there are fixed mode > > resolutions (i.e. LCD displays). So fbcon has to adpat to this. What we > > shoudl do is set the console mode fit slightly smaller than that the > > actually resolution. The reason being is partially drawn fonts at the > > bottom of the screen would look bad. So clearing the margins also has to > > be fixed. This way we clean up the screen for situtations where the > > console screen size doesn't quite fit the resolution. This is what shoudl > > be done. > > Excuse me that I dare to comment on this as a total fbdev-rookie: > > Please think about usability, too. Forcing people to fiddle with rows > and cols, requiring knowledge about font sizes and stuff is at least > inappropriate. Folks are used to think in resolutions, that's what they > understand, and that's what is most obvious. I can't imagine anyone > caring about the amount of rows or columns on a text screen. > If you are working in a console, then you indeed need to work on rows and columns. > BTW: What happens currently if I instruct console to replace the current > font with a bigger one (if that's possible at run-time at all) ? It will work, as the rows and columns are recalculated. Tony |