|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2003-03-05 11:05:53
|
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 04:26:04PM +0800, Antonino Daplas wrote: > > Hi, > > I believe it's time to finalize what is needed/not needed for the > framebuffer framework: > > 1. Text mode support? Would this work also on arches which don't traditionnaly do text mode ? Like ppc for example. > 2. console resizing using fbset (besides stty)? What about dynamic multi-head support ? > 7. Anything else? Well, what is the exact status of mult-head and multi-seat ? It is supposed to work, but i did not (yet) experience it myself, mainly because non of my graphic cards are yet supported. One point i would like to see addressed is the ability to share one framebuffer and have both heads be separate viewports into this same framebuffer. This means setting a framebuffer with a stride equal to the sum of both's head resolution and having each head display a subset of it. This would also include having one head be a mirror of the other and other such things. This feature and resizing may cause problems though. > 8. feature freeze deadline? This would be for fbdev deature freeze, right, not for the drivers ? BTW, i will no more be able to work on pm3fb, since i just recently noticed that my nice AGP8 supporting motherboard doesn't accept my Appian Jeronimo 2000 board. :((( Friendly, Sven Luther |