|
From: Jon S. <jon...@ya...> - 2003-03-01 18:42:37
|
--- Linus Torvalds <tor...@tr...> wrote: > From: Linus Torvalds <tor...@tr...> > To: Keith Whitwell <ke...@tu...> > CC: Jon Smirl <jon...@ya...>, Ian Romanick > <id...@us...>, > "DRI developer's list" > <dri...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] future of DRI? > Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 10:15:06 -0800 (PST) > > > On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > Interesting you mention it. This is what Brian & > I've done in the Mesa > > embedded branch -- layered the radeon dri driver > on top of fbdev. I can also > > build regular DRI drivers from a minimal tree & > sane set of makefiles. > > Personally, I'd rather see DRI _underneath_ fbdev > rather than on top of. > Since fbdev would require at least to know of (and > obey) the DRI locking > code - and would likely want to use all the same DRI > command execution for > things like blits etc (this is on the assumption > that 2d and 3d will > eventually use the same engine, which is probably a > safe assumption). > > I _assume_ that what you really mean is that you use > fbdev really only to > set up the screen modes and do things like > initialize the graphics > buffers. > > Linus > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Dri-devel mailing list > Dri...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel ===== Jon Smirl jon...@ya... __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ |