|
From: David S. M. <da...@re...> - 2003-02-21 01:00:41
|
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 11:58, James Simmons wrote: > > (3) persuade me that I want to write matroxcon and forget about fbcon at all, or > > This is the best solution. And then we will have sbuscon as well, thus two places where putcs() is necessary. I don't understand, but I do hope that at some point it will be realized that maybe allowing fbcon to generically handle putcs() hardware is beneficial. I can dream. :-) |