|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2003-02-05 20:13:45
|
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:44:00PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote: > > From: Julian Smart > > I would certainly be keen to encourage better uptake of Linux through > > use of wxWindows, but I have to take issue with the argument that > > a framebuffer-based approach is going to help this. XFree86 has had years > > of development and tweaking. Are you really saying that we could > > write a better X11 replacement? Even if we did and managed to write > > a 3rd super-duper desktop environment with all the required little apps, > > we'd face a huge struggle in persuading people to use our particular > > environment instead of X11. > > > XFree86 has done a tremendous amount of effort. Still large part of this > is simply spent in the wrong places. Instead of keeping writing directly > to the hardware they should concentrate in building kernel drivers, > maybe separate maybe together with the framebuffer people. Currently it Well, remember that X don't run on just Linux, so i guess they are afraid of duplicating the work, having to rewrite the driver for each OS they run on. And as a X driver writer, i understand that concern. Friendly, Sven Luther |