|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2003-01-14 21:26:57
|
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:22:36AM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote: > --- Sven Luther <lu...@dp...> wrote: > > I think Linus rejected this last time James > > submitted it. > > Didn't the last patch just move the DRM directory from > driver/char into the video directory.? There is a response of linus in the mailing list archive about this, i don't remember nor checked if it was only the first time, or not. I think the objection was about complicate to supervise diffs. > This could be done in two steps. First split out the > fb console driver files into their own directory and > then sort out the hardware drivers more. Then if the > DRM merge gets ok'd everything will be ready. > > In the config system I don't like how you have to > enable driver support for the same piece of hardware > in two different places. I also don't like looking in > two different places for the source to drivers for the > same hardware. > > What is Linus' take on merging a card's fb and drm > drivers into a single module in the long run? Well, the problem is that the fb drivers are maintained by us, and the drm drivers are maintained by the DRI. Also, i think the drm drivers should compile not only on linux, but on other oses too (BSDs at least). Also, i believe some of the XFree86 guys don't like fbdevs. Friendly, Sven Luther |