|
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2003-01-10 02:32:08
|
> > > Yes, this wrong, and afaik, it's your original port to 2.5 that did that > > > ;) > > > > Yeap. The idea of check_var is to validate a mode. Note modedb uses just > > check_var. It is okay to READ the values in your par. You shouldn't alter > > the values in par. > > Perhaps it makes sense to make the info parameter of fb_check_var() const to > prevent this from happening? Easy fix. I can whip up a quick patch for that. |