|
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2003-01-08 09:55:56
|
On 8 Jan 2003, Antonino Daplas wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 05:06, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On 8 Jan 2003, Antonino Daplas wrote:
> > > 2. diff submitted by Geert: cleaner logo data preparation for
> > > monochrome cards and correct initialization of palette_cmap.transp.
> >
> > I'll have to do some more fixes there, since the monochrome logo is used not
> > only on monochrome displays, but on all other displays with bits_per_pixel < 4
> > Since the pixel data in fb_image are colormap indices, they have to reflect the
> > correct `black' and `white' colors on such displays.
> >
> > E.g. on amifb (which supports all bits_per_pixel from 1 through 8) the logo
> > showed up in black-and-blue with bits_per_pixel == 3, cfr. the first two
> > entries of {red,green,blue}8[] in fbcmap.c.
> >
>
> Hmm, I see. I think only linux_logo_bw will be the only one affected,
> since linux_logo_16 happens to match the console palette and in
> linux_logo, we either reset the palette and/or the cmap.
Indeed.
> Would expanding each bit to the full bit depth work? Ie for bpp=8 using
> monochrome data, white is 0 and black is 0xff.
For bpp=8 that won't work, since we have 16 console colors only :-)
But for bpp=[1-3] that's OK, cfr. fbcmap.c.
BTW, perhaps it makes sense to just pass the appropriate `black' and `white'
pixel values to the logo conversion routine? Preferably through a 2-element
array, so we can index it with the logo data bit value instead of using
tests/branches. Then we'd have:
- mono01: black = (1<<bits_per_pixel)-1, white = 0
- mono10: black = 0, white = (1<<bits_per_pixel)-1
- pseudocolor depth 1: black = 0, white = 1
- pseudocolor depth 2: black = 0, white = 3
- pseudocolor depth 3: black = 0, white (actually light grey) = 7
And thanks to the `(1<<depth)-1' instead of `1' for the mono* cases, monochrome
with bits_per_pixel = e.g. 8 will work as well.
What do you think?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li...
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|