|
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2002-12-29 01:17:39
|
> The text is written as if it's thinking about handling 64-bit > unsigned long, but it doesn't. The tables that map bits to > pixels are completely unprepared for this. > > I thought about widening the tables, but I thought they'd get > unreasonably large. There's no reason not to go ahead and > handle this 32-bits at a time. I thought the tables would come back to haunt us. The only reason the tables where introduced was for speed enhancements. I reason the code is extra complex was so you could pass 64 bits of data across the bus. I still like to see that happen still. What do you think? |