|
From: Miles L. <mil...@at...> - 2002-12-11 16:05:49
|
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 04:49, Antonino Daplas wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 05:39, Miles Lane wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have tried getting rivafb to work in 2.5.51. It is much better
> > than before (thanks!). It compiles and sorta works.
> >
> > Here are the problems:
> >
> > When I run "fbset -a 640x480", I get display that fills
> > the screen and looks okay, but most of the characters are
> > flipped along the vertical axis, so they are backwards, so that:
> >
> > +---- ----+
> > | |
> > +--- becomes ---+
> > | |
> > | |
> >
> What's the hardware, is it on a big endian machine? I think there's a
> typo there (__BIG_ENDIAN__ instead of __BIG_ENDIAN). This should
> produce the "mirroring" effect.
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor stepping 01
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-751 [Irongate]
System Controller (rev 25)
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV10 [GeForce 256
DDR] (rev 10) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
Subsystem: VISIONTEK: Unknown device 000b
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 64 (1250ns min, 250ns max)
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
Region 0: Memory at fd000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
[size=16M]
Region 1: Memory at e8000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
Expansion ROM at feaf0000 [disabled] [size=64K]
Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 1
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [44] AGP version 2.0
Status: RQ=31 SBA- 64bit- FW+ Rate=x1,x2,x4
Command: RQ=0 SBA- AGP- 64bit- FW- Rate=<none>
> Secondly, a lot of the changes there are for riva128, which may not
> apply for all cards. Try doing fbset -accel false/true and see if
> there's any effect. Or open linux/video/drivers/riva/fbdev.c, line 277
> and comment out the line with the FB_ACCELF_TEXT. This should force the
> hardware to do everything in software.
Thanks, I'll check this today.
Miles
|