|
From: <dol...@cl...> - 2002-04-13 06:32:45
|
> You might try to look at the possibility of merging it back into pm3fb, or > at least merge the common parts of both drivers, altough i am not sure > what romain thinks about it, since there were many changes to the pm3fb > driver since romain worked on it, and it may not be easy or worthwhile to > merge them together. Huh ? pm3fb in 2.4.19pre6 seems to be exactly the same as my CVS... Or are you talking about the old attempt at a port that I put in linux-console a while ago ? It someone managed to get it to work Id'd like to hear of it, and eventually to merge the change that were done in regular pm3fb since the first port. I don't think merging is worth the effort. There's not that much code in common (beside some registers definitions), pm2fb support more buses than pm3fb (PCI/AGP -only), and very few people will need both pm2fb and pm3fb at the same time. We might save a few KiB from the kernel sources, but that's not worth the pain, and it would bloat the kernel for those with only pm2 or pm3 card(s). -- Romain DOLBEAU | Energy derives from both ENS Cachan / Ker Lann | the plus and negative Thesard IRISA / CAPS | -- Metallica, dol...@cl... | 'Eye of the Beholder' |