|
From: <jg...@pa...> - 2001-12-18 14:24:14
|
I don't much care what the range is. 0-10 seemed a bit low to us as a range, and the hardware we have today has a range of a couple hundred, though the highest values have to be avoided due to lifetime/power consumption. So we arbitrarily matched what WinCE did and limited the the high value to what we understood the limits on frontlight lifetime dictated, and rescaled to match. Moral: most/all hardware will have to have a simple rescaling/limit testing anyway, so it is pretty arbitrary. Besides guessing that 0-10 or 0-15 isn't quite enough granularity, I don't care if it is 0-255, or 0-65535. Remember, the eye is a logarithmic device, so you have quite a few decades of intensity to cover. I'd pick either 0-255 or 0-65535, rather than 0-15. - Jim -- Jim Gettys Cambridge Research Laboratory Compaq Computer Corporation jg...@pa... |