|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-12-04 17:29:04
|
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 18:15, Sottek, Matthew J wrote: > So what should be done on a vt switch? > I think it may be ok to zap() someone's mmap during a vt switch but > otherwise make them work out their own policy. vt switches are > slow anyway. >=20 > I am unsure of how XFree handles this. Does the X server trap the > vt switch sequence, call leave_vt() then switch the vt? More or less, yes. It has a semaphore to guard hardware access. --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast |