|
From: <cw...@so...> - 2001-11-27 05:30:44
|
> > Linus dreams of a network transparentancy. I also like that idea. So the > > two things he wants to see go away are mmap and ioctl functionality. In sorry to jump in. i missed this eariler i guess. How can removing something useful like mmap be good? in the name of network transparency perhaps, but it has many uses. I don't know of any other way this type of functionality could be implimented without taking a huge speed hit. (mmapedbuffer[offset] memory write versus read/write/seek wrapper) perhaps a better way of implimenting this can happen? surely removing mmap is not the way to go. I agree that network transparency is a good thing, but perhaps expect applications to check for an mmap failure, and then use read/write fallbacks as necessary. or, (new trend), a local dev fs that indicates devices that are mmap friendly or somethign equally insane. sorry for the rant, i may be completely wrong. chris |